Search for: "McDonald v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 629
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am by rainey Reitman
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 11:07 am by Matthew Kahn
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit disagreed, concluding that it was bound by its 2010 decision in United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 8:18 pm by Josh Blackman
[He talked about COVID and Religious Liberty, the Second Amendment, Free Speech, and "Bullying" of the Supreme Court by U.S. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 5:53 am by Guest
In McDonald’s India v Vikram Bakshi, the Delhi High Court rejected the complete applicability of Modi Entertainment to anti-arbitral injunctions, due to the principles of party autonomy and competence-competence. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 5:03 pm by Eugene Volokh
Mai was born in a Thai refugee camp to a Vietnamese family and moved to the United States at the age of two. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 5:05 pm
As we head into a hot holiday weekend, here are some appellate items to explore:Today's DJ has Justice Moore's piece on Jackie Robinson, United States v. 2LT Jack R Robinson as well as Marc Alexander's book review: Notorious RBG Talks Life, Love, Liberty, and LawThe Recorder's On Appeals column has Katy Graham's The Far-Reaching Effects of a Landmark Decision on the Standard of Appellate Review for Clear and Convincing… [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 6:59 am by Kristian Soltes
Department of Justice and a contingent of state attorneys general challenged AmEx’s anti-steering rules in a case that reached the Supreme Court in 2018 as Ohio v. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 9:14 am by Mavrick Law Firm
  A recent case before the United States Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals explained that these time extensions will not be extended if the delay in receipt was caused by the plaintiff. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by Jon L. Gelman
A claim for public nuisance is pending against McDonald’s.III. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
United States Blog Law Online has a post “Trump Hits the Wall of Courts’ Prior Restraint Precedents”. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 7:05 am by Patrick Daniel Law
Product liability cases are rarely as spectacular as the McDonald’s case, or the $28 billion case of United States v. [read post]