Search for: "McDonald v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 629
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2013, 1:27 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 9:38 pm by Michael J.Z. Mannheimer
And a second amicus brief focused on Justice Thomas, but on his reliance in McDonald v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 8:23 am by Kurt Lash
Representing the petitioners in McDonald v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:25 pm by Kent Scheidegger
The American exceptionalism view got a big boost today, and the universality view took a big hit in the guns case, McDonald v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 6:52 am
How sad it is that one can implicitly criticize a brief to the Supreme Court of the United States for relying on the text of the Constitution. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 1:55 pm
The petition in McDonald, et al., v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 10:52 pm by Randy Barnett
As Jim Lindgren has noted, on the eve of the argument in McDonald v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 5:05 pm
As we head into a hot holiday weekend, here are some appellate items to explore:Today's DJ has Justice Moore's piece on Jackie Robinson, United States v. 2LT Jack R Robinson as well as Marc Alexander's book review: Notorious RBG Talks Life, Love, Liberty, and LawThe Recorder's On Appeals column has Katy Graham's The Far-Reaching Effects of a Landmark Decision on the Standard of Appellate Review for Clear and Convincing… [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 12:00 am by William Gaskill
United States v Baker The government filed a Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b) motion more than a year after Baker’s original sentencing seeking a six month reduction to Baker’s sentence. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 10:30 am by Lisa McElroy
Roberts, Jr., the Chief Justice of the United States?  [read post]
21 May 2015, 4:40 am by Joy Waltemath
Section 260.3 of the PWPCL requires that wages “shall be paid in lawful money of the United States or check. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 3:15 pm by Mark Tushnet
His separate opinion in Timbs insists, as did his opinion in McDonald, that the textual location for protection of fundamental rights against violation by state governments lies in the Fourteenth Amendment's "privileges or immunities" clause. [read post]