Search for: "McDonald v. United States" Results 161 - 180 of 860
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2010, 12:07 pm by Steve Vladeck
There's one place, though, where Second Amendment originalism does dovetail with some work I've done, and that's with regard to the "Militia Clauses" of Article I, which empower Congress "To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions," and "To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to… [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 12:07 pm by Steve Vladeck
Or, put another way, if Heller and McDonald are methodologically correct, might the Selective Draft Law Cases and Perpich be wrong? [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 1:34 pm by Ron Coleman
The company long ago established that premise in the United States, successfully forcing two restaurant companies, McBagel’s and the vegetarian McDharma’s, to change their names. . . . [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 10:00 am by Ron Coleman
The company long ago established that premise in the United States, successfully forcing two restaurant companies, McBagel’s and the vegetarian McDharma’s, to change their names. . . . [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 4:11 am by Clark
Heller – 554, U.S. 570 of 2008, McDonald v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 9:01 pm
McDonald, 453 F.3d 958, 962 (7th Cir. 2006); United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 2:55 am by Walter Olson
Vernon, Florida, subject of a famous documentary by Errol Morris, is the subject of coverage here (“By the end of the ’50s, the Florida Panhandle was responsible for two-thirds of all loss-of-limb accident claims in the United States. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 10:04 am by Anna Christensen
United States, the Court asked the Fourth Circuit to reconsider in the context of United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 10:50 am by Jim Lindgren
Among the nice other points of the paper are: (a) Bushrod Washington’s opinion in Corfield v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:58 am by JB
" In hindsight, what Gura should have said is, first, the Supreme Court overrules cases all the time-- just look at Citizens United this term-- (nudge, nudge, Justice Kennedy)-- and, second, that it wasn't really necessary to overrule Slaughter-House.Instead, the Court should overrule United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
For example, under the doctrine set forth in the 1979 case of United States v. [read post]