Search for: "McDonnell & McDonnell v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 526
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2024, 12:26 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
Federal courts have a well-established burden shifting test to analyze claims of discrimination under the landmark decision McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Dacon, 759 F.2d 989].When a Title VII discrimination claim is based on circumstantial evidence, as was here the case, the court said it applied "the familiar McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework to determine whether the plaintiff has shown sufficient evidence to survive [a motion for] summary judgment". [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Dacon, 759 F.2d 989].When a Title VII discrimination claim is based on circumstantial evidence, as was here the case, the court said it applied "the familiar McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework to determine whether the plaintiff has shown sufficient evidence to survive [a motion for] summary judgment". [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 7:35 am
United States [quoting the McDonnell case].In the McDonnell case, Roberts found that prosecutors had defined “official acts” too broadly; in the Trump decision, he took the position that prosecutors had considered the question too narrowly. [read post]