Search for: "McDonnell & McDonnell v. State" Results 221 - 240 of 634
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2008, 5:15 am
  As the New Jersey Supreme Court stated more than 25 years ago in Francis v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 3:00 am by Amy Howe
” Commentary on last week’s decision in McDonnell v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 10:33 am by Andrew Delaney
, 2015 VT 108By Elizabeth KruskaI had completely forgotten about the three-part burden-shifting test from McDonnell Douglas v. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 9:44 am
The 7th Circuit also held that Plaintiff failed to establish his prima facie case under McDonnell Douglas in two different areas, one being that not one single employee who committed this offense remained on the job.Plaintiff also sought to convince the Court to adopt the more relaxed standard articulated in Pantoja v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 8:12 am by Leiza Dolghih
This week, the United States Supreme Court issued a long-awaited ruling in Young v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 8:30 am by Steven G. Pearl
In such a case, the disciplinary action is subject to the burden-shifting analysis articulated by the United States Supreme Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 5:33 am by Jim Sedor
Maureen McDonnell was acquitted of lying on a loan document. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 7:46 am by Joy Waltemath
“Such discrimination is unlawful under the LAD,” the court stated, finding that the trial court went awry when it evaluated his marital-status-discrimination claim through the prism of the McDonnell Douglas circumstantial-evidence analysis rather than the direct-evidence analysis. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
”Affirming the district court’s decision granting CUNY summary judgment on Plaintiff’s retaliation claim, the court explained that under McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 7:06 am
On Friday, the high court in two states issued opinions relating to foreclosures. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 4:44 am by Thomas J. Crane
Pointing to employment law, the court noted the circumstantial method of proof first enunciated by McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]