Search for: "McDonnell & McDonnell v. State"
Results 221 - 240
of 524
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2008, 8:16 am
” In Fitzgerald v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 8:33 am
The court also found that Conitz failed to show the elements of a prima facie case of discrimination under McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 3:12 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 6:18 am
In McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 8:02 am
§285), and numerous states have taken action against NPE's as well. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 2:07 pm
” (EEOC v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 4:00 am
Summary judgment was also affirmed against their equal protection claim (Carson v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 12:01 pm
Livingston v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 11:48 am
See McDonnell v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 10:09 am
United States. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 10:09 am
United States. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
Dacon, 759 F.2d 989].When a Title VII discrimination claim is based on circumstantial evidence, as was here the case, the court said it applied "the familiar McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework to determine whether the plaintiff has shown sufficient evidence to survive [a motion for] summary judgment". [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
Dacon, 759 F.2d 989].When a Title VII discrimination claim is based on circumstantial evidence, as was here the case, the court said it applied "the familiar McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework to determine whether the plaintiff has shown sufficient evidence to survive [a motion for] summary judgment". [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 2:49 am
Lopez, Tax Rulings and State Aid: Now or Never, in Guest State aid blog, 27.11.2014, accessible at: https://www.lexxion.eu/en/stateaidpost/tax-rulings-and-state-aid-now-or-never/. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 2:46 pm
In McKelvy v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 3:12 pm
In Young v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 3:40 pm
Merrick‘s analysis was predicated on the familiar McDonnell-Douglas burden-shifting framework—which the Court held applied to state law discrimination claims under FEHA just as it would to federal Title VII claims—and thus has implications for any claims in federal court analyzed under that framework. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 3:40 pm
Merrick‘s analysis was predicated on the familiar McDonnell-Douglas burden-shifting framework—which the Court held applied to state law discrimination claims under FEHA just as it would to federal Title VII claims—and thus has implications for any claims in federal court analyzed under that framework. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 11:48 am
Driving on I-95 between the North Carolina state line and Fredericksburg, Virginia may soon cost drivers a toll. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 11:16 am
The pair were originally convicted and sentenced for the corruption charges in 2015, but the verdict was vacated after the US Supreme Court decision in McDonnell v. [read post]
