Search for: "McDonnell & McDonnell v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 634
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2020, 5:21 pm
Conversely, Article IX of the Fundamental Law stated: “1. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 12:46 pm
Davis v. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 9:43 am
We do not think that a White House meeting is an “official act” under McDonnell v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
” United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 8:19 am
Thus, for example, price discounts aimed at recreating the right balance among spectrum fees are not considered State aid. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 12:50 pm
” my commentary for June 20, 2017. [5] McDonnell v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm
Since the ruling in Young v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 6:00 am
Walker, Jr., op. cit., citing Payne v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 10:00 am
McDonnell v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 7:00 am
United States, finding that the Hobbs Act requires a quid pro quo when involving campaign contributions; and McDonnell v. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 10:00 am
United States and McDonnell v. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 7:00 am
In the 2016 case of McDonnell v. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 7:38 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in Elhady v. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 9:03 am
” In light of recent limiting decisions (see McDonnell v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 11:40 am
This post summarizes decisions published during August 2019 by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals that are of interest to state practitioners [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 8:30 am
United States. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 5:06 am
Reversing in large part the decision of the court below, the panel found the detective raised triable issues as to whether she was regarded as disabled and whether her employer discriminated against her on the basis of her race and gender (Lewis v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 8:00 am
The Second Circuit in United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 4:22 am
Accordingly, the member states should support the right to education, in particular those facing disadvantages, or having special needs. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 7:56 am
On appeal, Thiam argued that the jury instructions were erroneous because they failed to include the definition of “official act” relative to a bribery conviction, as set forth in McDonnell v. [read post]
