Search for: "McDonnell & McDonnell v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 636
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
In 2003, California lawmakers enacted Labor Code Section 1102.6, setting forth a framework for whistleblower retaliation claims that varied from the burden-shifting test established by the United States Supreme Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 2:49 am by Amy Howe
United States as a case that is “likely to be the Term’s most important federal sentencing case, and its second-most important immigration case after United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 9:14 pm by Harold S. Berman
Irex Corp., United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, No. 17-30660, 17 October 2018 appeared first on Kluwer Patent Blog. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 12:30 am by Joseph Arshawsky
Baker Hughes Inc., United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, No. 2018-1141, 18 October 2018 appeared first on Kluwer Patent Blog. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 8:05 am by michael
High Court (Chancery Division) Mahon & Anor v FBN Bank (UK) Ltd [2011] EWHC 1432 (Ch) (6 June 2011) Green (Liquidator of Stealth Construction Ltd) v Ireland [2011] EWHC 1305 (Ch) (20 May 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Mabiriizi v HSBC Insurance (UK) Ltd [2011] EWHC 1280 (QB) (20 May 2011) OOO & Ors v The Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2011] EWHC 1246 (QB) (20 May 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) Francis, R (on the… [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division also noted that the supervisor who allegedly indicated a discriminatory motive was not the ultimate decision-maker, and the record shows that BOE immediately offered Petitioner another tenured track position after terminating his employment in the Homebound Program.The court commented that the same result would obtain whether the matter was analyzed pursuant to the traditional framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v Green, 411 US 792, or under a… [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 8:24 am by Sam Favate
McDonnell has not yet taken a position on the personhood bill. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 7:40 am by Joy Waltemath
” The dissent, however, believed that no reasonable jury could find that the agency’s assertion that it didn’t hire her due to her inexperience was pretexual (Walsh v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 5:22 am by Daniel E. Cummins
In a recent May 10, 2016 decision out of the Federal Western District Court of Pennsylvania in the case of Schutte v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 2:45 am by Jack Sharman
[NOTE: a version of this article by my colleague Jordan Patterson and I first appeared in Law360 on 29 January 2020] In its most recent consideration of the honest-services fraud prosecution of former Speaker of the New York State Assembly Sheldon Silver, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit followed the letter and spirit of the Supreme Court in McDonnell v. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 6:44 am by
Supreme Court to see who will carry the burden of proof in such cases This is known as the “McDonnell Douglass framework” as it came from the Supreme Court’s ruling in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]