Search for: "McDonnell & McDonnell v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 639
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2019, 7:00 am by Ellen Podgor
United States, finding that the Hobbs Act requires a quid pro quo when involving campaign contributions; and McDonnell v. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 7:38 am by Gordon Ahl
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in Elhady v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 11:40 am by Phil Dixon
This post summarizes decisions published during August 2019 by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals that are of interest to state practitioners [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 5:06 am by Joy Waltemath
Reversing in large part the decision of the court below, the panel found the detective raised triable issues as to whether she was regarded as disabled and whether her employer discriminated against her on the basis of her race and gender (Lewis v. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 4:22 am by Dáire McCormack-George
Accordingly, the member states should support the right to education, in particular those facing disadvantages, or having special needs. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 7:56 am by Xi Lucy Shi
On appeal, Thiam argued that the jury instructions were erroneous because they failed to include the definition of “official act” relative to a bribery conviction, as set forth in McDonnell v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 11:03 am by Noel Francisco
Dreeben argues in Turner v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 4:25 am by Lisa Rodgers
The Court of Appeal disagreed, stating that the important consideration was not the sufficient British connection between the employer and employee for the purposes of employment law, but rather the connection between the co-workers. [read post]
20 Jul 2019, 5:30 am by Vishnu Kannan
Jacques Singer-Emery and Patrick McDonnell assessed recent developments at the military commission in United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 11:17 am by Hadley Baker, Vishnu Kannan
ICYMI: Last Weekend on Lawfare Jacques Singer-Emery and Patrick McDonnell assessed recent developments at the military commission in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
While Lessig treats Marshall’s opinion in Marbury v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 5:51 am by Joy Waltemath
She had no evidence showing intentional discrimination, so the appeals court turned to the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework. [read post]