Search for: "McDonnell & McDonnell v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 533
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2020, 9:37 am
Of course the Bridgegate (Kelly v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 6:00 am
§ 666 should be construed to include quasi-sovereign public international entities like the United Nations; and (2) whether the official-act requirement under McDonnell v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 10:01 am
India unlike civil law countries like the United States[2], Germany[3] and France[4] does not codify the definition of force majeure into any legislation. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 9:18 am
A similar dispute arose later in the Djibouti v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 10:09 am
As for the notion of ‘territory’, it was recalled that it may include geographical areas which, although under the jurisdiction or responsibility of a different State, have a separate and distinct status under international law (Court of Justice, Council v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
We have previously written at length on decisions of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT), or State or Federal Courts on the classification of goods for customs purposes. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 2:45 am
[NOTE: a version of this article by my colleague Jordan Patterson and I first appeared in Law360 on 29 January 2020] In its most recent consideration of the honest-services fraud prosecution of former Speaker of the New York State Assembly Sheldon Silver, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit followed the letter and spirit of the Supreme Court in McDonnell v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 8:13 am
United States, as well as at Howe on the Court, where it was originally published. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 5:21 pm
Conversely, Article IX of the Fundamental Law stated: “1. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 12:46 pm
Davis v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
” United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 8:19 am
Thus, for example, price discounts aimed at recreating the right balance among spectrum fees are not considered State aid. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 12:50 pm
” my commentary for June 20, 2017. [5] McDonnell v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm
Since the ruling in Young v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 6:00 am
Walker, Jr., op. cit., citing Payne v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 10:00 am
McDonnell v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 7:00 am
United States, finding that the Hobbs Act requires a quid pro quo when involving campaign contributions; and McDonnell v. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 10:00 am
United States and McDonnell v. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 7:00 am
In the 2016 case of McDonnell v. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 9:03 am
” In light of recent limiting decisions (see McDonnell v. [read post]
