Search for: "McDonnell & McDonnell v. State" Results 161 - 180 of 636
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2019, 7:59 pm by Patent Docs
In this presentation, MBHB attorney and Patent Docs contributor Joshua Rich will address the following topics: • The consideration requirement to support restrictive covenant cases in various courts, both Federal and State • Ex parte seizure developments under the DTSA • Pleading pitfalls in DTSA cases • The Supreme Court's consideration of the trade secrets exception to FOIA in Food Marketing Institute v.... [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 6:40 am by Kyle Dudek
She can do so in a variety of ways, one of which is by navigating the familiar burden-shifting framework established by the Supreme Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 9:04 pm by Patent Docs
February 19, 2019 - Post-argument discussion on the Return Mail Inc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 7:48 am by Joy Waltemath
The employee’s retaliation claim also was remanded for the lower court to consider, in the first instance, her argument that she had direct evidence of retaliation (Gardner v. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 5:44 am by Dáire McCormack-George
In other words, assume countries A and B have concluded a PTA in accordance with Article V GATS. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 5:44 am by Maria Kendrick
In other words, assume countries A and B have concluded a PTA in accordance with Article V GATS. [read post]
24 Nov 2018, 10:41 am by Thorsten Bausch
The Guidelines for Examination, Part F, V, 9, state that “no objection on account of lack of unity a priori is justified in respect of a dependent claim and the claim on which it depends, on the ground that the general concept they have in common is the subject-matter of the independent claim, which is also contained in the dependent claim”. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 3:30 pm by George Basharis
Cisco Systems, Inc., United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, No. 2017-1525, 09 November 2018 appeared first on Kluwer Patent Blog. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 12:04 am by Kit Chong Ng
The Decision in UP v Hungary – Achmea does not apply to ICSID Tribunals On 9 October 2018, the Tribunal in UP and CD Holding Internationale v Hungary (ICSID Case No. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 1:06 am by Ilarion Tomarov
Ilarion TomarovThe Ukrainian Supreme Court in Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp v Aurobindo Pharma Limited has recently introduce a bold approach to applying interim injunctions in disputes between originators and generics over the registration of patented pharmaceuticals. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 9:14 pm by Harold S. Berman
Irex Corp., United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, No. 17-30660, 17 October 2018 appeared first on Kluwer Patent Blog. [read post]