Search for: "McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green" Results 1 - 20 of 99
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2010, 6:09 pm
The Supreme Court also dropped a footnote, however, stating that:"the Court has not definitively decided whether the evidentiary framework of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 6:40 am by Kyle Dudek
She can do so in a variety of ways, one of which is by navigating the familiar burden-shifting framework established by the Supreme Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 4:39 am by Jon Hyman
The burden-shifting framework created by McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 4:39 am by Jon Hyman
The burden-shifting framework created by McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 3:28 am by PaulKostro
A-2927-13T4, February 17, 2015: New Jersey courts rely on the burden-shifting test developed in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 3:20 am by PaulKostro
A-4634-13T1, February 13, 2015: In order to prove a discriminatory discharge claim by indirect evidence under the familiar burden-shifting analysis of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 2:31 pm by PaulKostro
., A-2391-11T4, June 6, 2013: Our courts evaluate New Jersey’s Law Against Discrimination (LAD), N.J.S.A. 10:5-1 to -42, claims under the burden-shifting analysis enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As a cause of action for breach of contract accrues and the statute of limitations commences when the contract is breached and Petitioner did not file suit within one year of the alleged breach, the Circuit Court opined that his breach of contract claim was untimely.* McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As a cause of action for breach of contract accrues and the statute of limitations commences when the contract is breached and Petitioner did not file suit within one year of the alleged breach, the Circuit Court opined that his breach of contract claim was untimely.* McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 6:41 am by PaulKostro
A-5399-12T3, October 21, 2014: In order to prove a discriminatory discharge claim under the familiar burden-shifting analysis of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 5:56 am by PaulKostro
A-2754-13T2, February 5, 2015: In order to prove a discriminatory discharge claim by indirect evidence under the familiar burden-shifting analysis of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 7:13 am by Chris Lazarini
Next, the Court conducts the three-part burden shifting analysis developed in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 7:13 am by Chris Lazarini
Next, the Court conducts the three-part burden shifting analysis developed in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 7:13 am by Chris Lazarini
Next, the Court conducts the three-part burden shifting analysis developed in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 3:45 am by PaulKostro
A-4123-12T3, November 6, 2014: Our courts review claims of discrimination under the Law Against Discrimination (LAD), N.J.S.A. 10:5-1 to-49, under the familiar burden-shifting analysis of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]