Search for: "McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green" Results 1 - 20 of 97
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
.** Petitioner, contending the district court failed to properly consider his evidence and improperly credited evidence submitted by Defendant, appealed the district court's ruling.The Second Circuit Court of Appeals said that in considering Petitioner’s Title VII retaliation claim, it employ the three-step burden-shifting framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
.** Petitioner, contending the district court failed to properly consider his evidence and improperly credited evidence submitted by Defendant, appealed the district court's ruling.The Second Circuit Court of Appeals said that in considering Petitioner’s Title VII retaliation claim, it employ the three-step burden-shifting framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Under the Supreme Court's ruling in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:24 am by Guest Author
 Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971) McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 5:32 am by Eugene Volokh
The court allowed plaintiff's race and sexual orientation discrimination claim to go forward: In the absence of direct evidence of discrimination, the Court applies the burden-shifting framework established in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 3:21 pm by Phillips & Associates
The 4 Parts of a Federal Pregnancy Discrimination Case When you pursue a discrimination case under federal law (Title VII,) you have to meet the test created by the Supreme Court‘s decision in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 6:44 am by zola.support.team
Supreme Court to see who will carry the burden of proof in such cases This is known as the “McDonnell Douglass framework” as it came from the Supreme Court’s ruling in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 11:47 am by Resnick Law Group, P.C.
This is known as the “McDonnell Douglas framework,” after the Supreme Court’s 1973 ruling in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 8:59 am by Nassiri Law
Claims of whistleblower retaliation filed under labor laws in California are going to be weighed by the standard set forth in that law, rather than the more stringent burden-shifting test that was laid out in the 1973 case of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 4:22 pm by Elyssa Sternberg
The United States Supreme Court established a framework for evaluating discrimination claims based on circumstantial evidence in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 3:28 pm by McCormack Law Firm
When a court evaluates an employment discrimination claim relying on circumstantial evidence, it will use a burden-shifting analysis that was originally announced in the landmark opinion, McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 6:06 am by Thomas J. Crane
See, e.g., Graham v Long Island RR, 230 F.3d 34, 40 (2d Cir. 2000); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]