Search for: "McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green"
Results 1 - 20
of 100
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
"Under the burden-shifting framework of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
"Under the burden-shifting framework of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:51 pm
However, the name at the tips of employment lawyers’ tongues probably is the discrimination case of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
.** Petitioner, contending the district court failed to properly consider his evidence and improperly credited evidence submitted by Defendant, appealed the district court's ruling.The Second Circuit Court of Appeals said that in considering Petitioner’s Title VII retaliation claim, it employ the three-step burden-shifting framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
.** Petitioner, contending the district court failed to properly consider his evidence and improperly credited evidence submitted by Defendant, appealed the district court's ruling.The Second Circuit Court of Appeals said that in considering Petitioner’s Title VII retaliation claim, it employ the three-step burden-shifting framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm
Under the Supreme Court's ruling in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:24 am
Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971) McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 5:32 am
The court allowed plaintiff's race and sexual orientation discrimination claim to go forward: In the absence of direct evidence of discrimination, the Court applies the burden-shifting framework established in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 3:21 pm
The 4 Parts of a Federal Pregnancy Discrimination Case When you pursue a discrimination case under federal law (Title VII,) you have to meet the test created by the Supreme Court‘s decision in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
See McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 6:44 am
Supreme Court to see who will carry the burden of proof in such cases This is known as the “McDonnell Douglass framework” as it came from the Supreme Court’s ruling in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
* See McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
* See McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 4:08 pm
McDonnell Douglas, Corp. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 7:21 pm
(McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 11:47 am
This is known as the “McDonnell Douglas framework,” after the Supreme Court’s 1973 ruling in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 8:59 am
Claims of whistleblower retaliation filed under labor laws in California are going to be weighed by the standard set forth in that law, rather than the more stringent burden-shifting test that was laid out in the 1973 case of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 2:07 pm
Green (1973) 411 U.S. 792 (“McDonnell Douglas”). [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 3:11 pm
To fill that gap, California courts borrowed the familiar federal burden-shifting framework of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 8:43 am
Most courts use the burden-shifting framework established in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
