Search for: "McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green" Results 1 - 20 of 105
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2025, 12:04 pm by Mariah McGrogan and Joseph Flanagan
The employee – alongside the United States, which supported the employee as an amicus – argued that the “background circumstances” rule went against the framework outlined in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2025, 8:56 am by Marcia Coyle
In the Title VII case, Thomas flagged the justices’ 1973 decision in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2025, 3:00 am by Eric B. Meyer
For the Law Nerds: Justice Thomas lights into McDonnell Douglas Justice Thomas, joined by Justice Gorsuch, concurred fully in the result—but used the opportunity to question the entire McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
13 May 2025, 5:41 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Thus, a defendant’s motion for summary judgment must be analyzed under both the familiar framework of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2025, 8:10 am by Amy Howe
” The Supreme Court also turned down an invitation to overrule the half-century-old framework, first outlined in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2025, 7:55 pm by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit upheld his termination using the framework of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2025, 10:02 am
Hospital of Central Connecticut (Employment discrimination; reasonable accommodation for disability; summary judgment; applicability of burden shifting framework of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2025, 5:34 am by Kalvis Golde
City of Stockton, California 24-427Issues: (1) Whether this court should overrule McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 12:26 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
Federal courts have a well-established burden shifting test to analyze claims of discrimination under the landmark decision McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:51 pm by Parks, Chesin & Walbert
However, the name at the tips of employment lawyers’ tongues probably is the discrimination case of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]