Search for: "McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green"
Results 21 - 40
of 100
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
Am., Inc., 715 F.3d 102.** McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
"Under the burden-shifting framework of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
"Under the burden-shifting framework of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 3:20 pm
Although the burden shifted to the defendant under McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 6:11 pm
Though lacking direct evidence, the Complainant successfully set forth a prima facie case of gender-based discrimination under the three-stage burden-shifting framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
.** Petitioner, contending the district court failed to properly consider his evidence and improperly credited evidence submitted by Defendant, appealed the district court's ruling.The Second Circuit Court of Appeals said that in considering Petitioner’s Title VII retaliation claim, it employ the three-step burden-shifting framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
.** Petitioner, contending the district court failed to properly consider his evidence and improperly credited evidence submitted by Defendant, appealed the district court's ruling.The Second Circuit Court of Appeals said that in considering Petitioner’s Title VII retaliation claim, it employ the three-step burden-shifting framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 7:48 am
She can do so in a variety of ways, one of which is by navigating the now-familiar three-part burden-shifting framework established by the Supreme Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 7:21 pm
(McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division also noted that the supervisor who allegedly indicated a discriminatory motive was not the ultimate decision-maker, and the record shows that BOE immediately offered Petitioner another tenured track position after terminating his employment in the Homebound Program.The court commented that the same result would obtain whether the matter was analyzed pursuant to the traditional framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v Green,… [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 6:27 pm
” In it, I outline the basics of proving discrimination through disparate treatment evidence, discussing McDonnell-Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 1:34 pm
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 2:07 pm
Green (1973) 411 U.S. 792 (“McDonnell Douglas”). [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 9:33 am
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 11:34 am
(See McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 3:11 pm
To fill that gap, California courts borrowed the familiar federal burden-shifting framework of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 8:43 am
Most courts use the burden-shifting framework established in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 11:47 am
This is known as the “McDonnell Douglas framework,” after the Supreme Court’s 1973 ruling in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 1:42 pm
The First holds that merely being excluded from the management decisions is not enough under McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 8:24 am
The Supreme Court’s Holding In its decision, the Supreme Court assessed Young’s disparate-treatment discrimination claim and focused largely on the indirect method of proof under the McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
