Search for: "McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green"
Results 21 - 40
of 92
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2022, 8:59 am
Claims of whistleblower retaliation filed under labor laws in California are going to be weighed by the standard set forth in that law, rather than the more stringent burden-shifting test that was laid out in the 1973 case of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 2:07 pm
Green (1973) 411 U.S. 792 (“McDonnell Douglas”). [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 3:11 pm
To fill that gap, California courts borrowed the familiar federal burden-shifting framework of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 8:43 am
Most courts use the burden-shifting framework established in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 4:22 pm
The United States Supreme Court established a framework for evaluating discrimination claims based on circumstantial evidence in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 3:28 pm
When a court evaluates an employment discrimination claim relying on circumstantial evidence, it will use a burden-shifting analysis that was originally announced in the landmark opinion, McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 9:00 am
”Affirming the district court’s decision granting CUNY summary judgment on Plaintiff’s retaliation claim, the court explained that under McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 9:00 am
" * McDonnell Douglas Corp.v. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
” Courts test FMLA retaliation claims under the burden-shifting framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
” Courts test FMLA retaliation claims under the burden-shifting framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:46 pm
Supreme Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 4:00 am
As a cause of action for breach of contract accrues and the statute of limitations commences when the contract is breached and Petitioner did not file suit within one year of the alleged breach, the Circuit Court opined that his breach of contract claim was untimely.* McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 4:00 am
As a cause of action for breach of contract accrues and the statute of limitations commences when the contract is breached and Petitioner did not file suit within one year of the alleged breach, the Circuit Court opined that his breach of contract claim was untimely.* McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 9:23 am
(citing to McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 3:30 am
Apply the burden-shifting framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 5:36 am
"Addressing a motion for summary judgment on behalf of NYPD and certain of its named staff members [City Defendants], the Appellate Division said that an action brought under the NYCHRL must be analyzed under both the framework of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v Green, 411 US 792, and under the newer mixed motive framework, which imposes a lesser burden on a plaintiff opposing such a motion," citing Persaud v Walgreens Co., 161 AD3d 1019. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 5:36 am
"Addressing a motion for summary judgment on behalf of NYPD and certain of its named staff members [City Defendants], the Appellate Division said that an action brought under the NYCHRL must be analyzed under both the framework of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v Green, 411 US 792, and under the newer mixed motive framework, which imposes a lesser burden on a plaintiff opposing such a motion," citing Persaud v Walgreens Co., 161 AD3d 1019. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 2:24 pm
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
Am., Inc., 715 F.3d 102.** McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
Am., Inc., 715 F.3d 102.** McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
