Search for: "McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green" Results 41 - 60 of 100
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2018, 3:21 pm by Jessica Perry
” The Tenth Circuit noted that some sister circuits have disagreed, but opined that those courts reached the wrong conclusion based on an erroneous interpretation of the burden-shifting framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 8:28 pm by Anthony Zaller
Hernandez, 540 U.S. 44, 49 (2003) (citing McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 7:13 am by Chris Lazarini
Next, the Court conducts the three-part burden shifting analysis developed in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 7:13 am by Chris Lazarini
Next, the Court conducts the three-part burden shifting analysis developed in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 7:13 am by Chris Lazarini
Next, the Court conducts the three-part burden shifting analysis developed in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 6:30 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
En los casos por discrimen en la jurisdicción federal es aplicable la doctrina que se conoce como el “McDonnell Douglas paradigm”, establecido por el Tribunal Supremo de los Estados Unidos en McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 4:30 am by Donna Ballman
Thus, unlike in a typical case under Title VII involving the burden-shifting method of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 9:29 am by Michael C. Dorf
A judge or jury must then decide what the real reason for the firing was.The Supreme Court laid out the framework for adjudicating such cases in its 1973 ruling in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 11:54 am by Liisa Speaker
It upheld the lower court decision.The dissent, written by Judge Servitto, referred to a US Supreme Court case McDonnell Douglas Corp v Green, 411 US 792, as a framework for evaluating age-discrimination claims. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 6:11 pm by Conforto Law Group
Though lacking direct evidence, the Complainant successfully set forth a prima facie case of gender-based discrimination under the three-stage burden-shifting framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
” Does this mean that we can forget about shifting burdens of proof, as in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
” Does this mean that we can forget about shifting burdens of proof, as in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 4:39 am by Jon Hyman
The burden-shifting framework created by McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 4:39 am by Jon Hyman
The burden-shifting framework created by McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 4:44 am by Thomas J. Crane
Pointing to employment law, the court noted the circumstantial method of proof first enunciated by McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 11:11 am by Mays & Kerr LLC
The trial court analyzed those arguments under the standard created by a 1973 US Supreme Court case, McDonnell Douglas v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 4:58 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Last month, the OFCCP published in the Federal Register (80 FR 54934-54977) its final rule on regulations to implement Executive Order (EO) 13665 signed by President Obama in April 2014 which prohibits federal contractors from retaliating against employees who choose to discuss their compensation. [read post]