Search for: "McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green"
Results 41 - 60
of 94
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2017, 6:30 am
En los casos por discrimen en la jurisdicción federal es aplicable la doctrina que se conoce como el “McDonnell Douglas paradigm”, establecido por el Tribunal Supremo de los Estados Unidos en McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 4:30 am
Thus, unlike in a typical case under Title VII involving the burden-shifting method of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 9:29 am
A judge or jury must then decide what the real reason for the firing was.The Supreme Court laid out the framework for adjudicating such cases in its 1973 ruling in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 11:54 am
It upheld the lower court decision.The dissent, written by Judge Servitto, referred to a US Supreme Court case McDonnell Douglas Corp v Green, 411 US 792, as a framework for evaluating age-discrimination claims. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 8:11 am
This McDonnell Douglas test, named for the case of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 6:11 pm
Though lacking direct evidence, the Complainant successfully set forth a prima facie case of gender-based discrimination under the three-stage burden-shifting framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 3:30 am
” Does this mean that we can forget about shifting burdens of proof, as in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 3:30 am
” Does this mean that we can forget about shifting burdens of proof, as in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 4:39 am
The burden-shifting framework created by McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 4:39 am
The burden-shifting framework created by McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 4:44 am
Pointing to employment law, the court noted the circumstantial method of proof first enunciated by McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 6:30 am
"Parker said Young modified burden-shifting framework in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 11:11 am
The trial court analyzed those arguments under the standard created by a 1973 US Supreme Court case, McDonnell Douglas v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 4:58 pm
Last month, the OFCCP published in the Federal Register (80 FR 54934-54977) its final rule on regulations to implement Executive Order (EO) 13665 signed by President Obama in April 2014 which prohibits federal contractors from retaliating against employees who choose to discuss their compensation. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 7:28 am
By Cynthia L. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 1:52 pm
Those decisions, which upheld employers’ affirmative action plans against Title VII challenges, called for application of the three-step burden-shifting framework set forth by the High Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp v Green (3 EPD ¶8607). [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 6:07 am
Its analysis was governed by the three-step framework of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 6:10 am
IDX Systems Corp. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 3:12 pm
In Young v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 1:41 pm
The court, therefore, rejected a per se argument and concluded that a pregnant worker seeking to show disparate treatment must satisfy the McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
