Search for: "McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green" Results 61 - 80 of 94
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2014, 7:27 am by Joy Waltemath
Finally, the court pointed out that when the Supreme Court established the elements of a Title VII prima facie case in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v Green, it did not include any element that depended on breaking a contract. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 4:10 am
The plaintiff bears the initial burden of presenting a prima facie case and must show he or she is a member of a protected class, was qualified for his job, suffered an adverse employment action, and that others not in the protected class were treated more favorably [McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 8:28 pm by Anthony Zaller
Hernandez, 540 U.S. 44, 49 (2003) (citing McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
The Eleventh Circuit noted that a plaintiff who brings intentional-discrimination claims has several options available to her: [O]ne of which is by navigating the now-familiar three-part burden-shifting framework established by the Supreme Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 3:28 pm by McCormack Law Firm
When a court evaluates an employment discrimination claim relying on circumstantial evidence, it will use a burden-shifting analysis that was originally announced in the landmark opinion, McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 9:29 am by Michael C. Dorf
A judge or jury must then decide what the real reason for the firing was.The Supreme Court laid out the framework for adjudicating such cases in its 1973 ruling in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 4:08 am
Therefore, to survive a Motion for Summary Judgment, Ruggles was required to establish a circumstantial case under a burden shifting framework that the United States Supreme Court set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:24 am by Guest Author
 Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971) McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 6:07 am by Joy Waltemath
Its analysis was governed by the three-step framework of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:04 pm
The district court dismissed the Lindsays' complaint, concluding that they failed to plead facts establishing each element of a prima facie case as set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]