Search for: "McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green"
Results 61 - 80
of 99
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2012, 8:30 am
In such a case, the disciplinary action is subject to the burden-shifting analysis articulated by the United States Supreme Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 6:16 am
The plaintiff bears the initial burden of presenting a prima facie case and must show he or she is a member of a protected class, was qualified for his job, suffered an adverse employment action, and that others not in the protected class were treated more favorably [McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 9:23 am
(citing to McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 7:27 am
Finally, the court pointed out that when the Supreme Court established the elements of a Title VII prima facie case in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v Green, it did not include any element that depended on breaking a contract. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 4:10 am
The plaintiff bears the initial burden of presenting a prima facie case and must show he or she is a member of a protected class, was qualified for his job, suffered an adverse employment action, and that others not in the protected class were treated more favorably [McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 8:28 pm
Hernandez, 540 U.S. 44, 49 (2003) (citing McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
See McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 6:10 am
IDX Systems Corp. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 8:29 am
See McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 3:30 am
The Eleventh Circuit noted that a plaintiff who brings intentional-discrimination claims has several options available to her: [O]ne of which is by navigating the now-familiar three-part burden-shifting framework established by the Supreme Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 8:11 am
This McDonnell Douglas test, named for the case of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 6:18 pm
In Greene v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 12:43 pm
Under the “burden-shifting framework” of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 3:12 pm
In Young v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 3:28 pm
When a court evaluates an employment discrimination claim relying on circumstantial evidence, it will use a burden-shifting analysis that was originally announced in the landmark opinion, McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:46 pm
Supreme Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 1:58 pm
See McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 9:29 am
A judge or jury must then decide what the real reason for the firing was.The Supreme Court laid out the framework for adjudicating such cases in its 1973 ruling in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
24 May 2014, 5:13 pm
La Corte explica que esto viene de "McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 6:30 am
"Parker said Young modified burden-shifting framework in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
