Search for: "McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green"
Results 61 - 80
of 105
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2017, 7:13 am
Next, the Court conducts the three-part burden shifting analysis developed in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 12:43 pm
Under the “burden-shifting framework” of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 6:30 am
En los casos por discrimen en la jurisdicción federal es aplicable la doctrina que se conoce como el “McDonnell Douglas paradigm”, establecido por el Tribunal Supremo de los Estados Unidos en McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 9:29 am
A judge or jury must then decide what the real reason for the firing was.The Supreme Court laid out the framework for adjudicating such cases in its 1973 ruling in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 11:54 am
It upheld the lower court decision.The dissent, written by Judge Servitto, referred to a US Supreme Court case McDonnell Douglas Corp v Green, 411 US 792, as a framework for evaluating age-discrimination claims. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 8:11 am
This McDonnell Douglas test, named for the case of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 6:11 pm
Though lacking direct evidence, the Complainant successfully set forth a prima facie case of gender-based discrimination under the three-stage burden-shifting framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 3:30 am
” Does this mean that we can forget about shifting burdens of proof, as in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 3:30 am
” Does this mean that we can forget about shifting burdens of proof, as in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 4:39 am
The burden-shifting framework created by McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 4:39 am
The burden-shifting framework created by McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 6:30 am
"Parker said Young modified burden-shifting framework in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 11:11 am
The trial court analyzed those arguments under the standard created by a 1973 US Supreme Court case, McDonnell Douglas v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 6:10 am
IDX Systems Corp. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 3:12 pm
In Young v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 1:41 pm
The court, therefore, rejected a per se argument and concluded that a pregnant worker seeking to show disparate treatment must satisfy the McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 8:24 am
The Supreme Court’s Holding In its decision, the Supreme Court assessed Young’s disparate-treatment discrimination claim and focused largely on the indirect method of proof under the McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
24 May 2014, 5:13 pm
La Corte explica que esto viene de "McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division also noted that the supervisor who allegedly indicated a discriminatory motive was not the ultimate decision-maker, and the record shows that BOE immediately offered Petitioner another tenured track position after terminating his employment in the Homebound Program.The court commented that the same result would obtain whether the matter was analyzed pursuant to the traditional framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v Green,… [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
When there is no direct evidence of discrimination, plaintiffs can make use of the pretext model established by the Supreme Court in 1973 in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
