Search for: "McFarlane v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 104
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2010, 9:40 pm
The most notorious example has been McFarlane v Relate Avon Ltd, an unfair dismissal claim brought by a relationship counselor who as a result of his Christian beliefs refused to promote gay sex. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 2:39 pm
Moore-Bick LJ added a few words of agreement, while McFarlane LJ simply agreed with Proudman J. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 2:39 pm
Moore-Bick LJ added a few words of agreement, while McFarlane LJ simply agreed with Proudman J. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 8:53 am
State v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 3:30 am
In R (Wright) v Secretary of State for Health [2009] UKHL 3, Baroness Hale noted that Article 8 had been held to include the right to establish and develop relationships with others. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:31 am
[Sophia M.], 179 A.D.3d at 802, quoting People v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:27 am
[Sophia M.], 179 A.D.3d at 802, quoting People v. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 4:50 pm
, Kimberly Houser, Oklahoma State University and Gregory Voss, Toulouse Business School Privacy, Ignacio Cofone, NYU School of Law Next Week in the Courts On 30 July 2018, the Court of Appeal (Master of the Rolls, Mcfarlane and Sharp LJJ) will hand down judgment in the case of Stunt v Associated Newspapers, (heard 19 and 20 June 2018). [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 8:47 am
The winds of change On 29 October 2021, Sir Andrew McFarlane, the President of the Family Division, published a Report entitled “Confidence and Confidentiality: Transparency in the Family Courts”. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 4:18 pm
United States In the case of Simorangkir v Courtney Love Cobain the Court of Appeal of the State of California dismissed an appeal by Courtney Love seeking to have the case dismissed under California’s anti-SLAPP statute. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am
The Court found that Regulation 3 does not carry the force of law (see Weiss v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:58 am
– All-Party Parliamentary IP Group (IPKat) United States US General On hiring an employee of your competitor: Bimbo Bakeries v. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 4:36 pm
This has been established law since the decision in Clayton v Clayton [2006] EWCA Civ 878; [2007] 1 FLR. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:02 pm
But having stated reasons for her decision, the judge issued a written judgment from this preliminary hearing. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 4:11 pm
Last Week in the Courts On 12 February 2018, the Court of Appeal (McFarlane and Sharp LJJ and Sir John Laws) handed down judgment in the case of Stocker v Stocker [2018] EWCA Civ 170. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 4:57 pm
On 30 January 2018 the Court of Appeal gave the claimant permission to appeal in the case of Butt v Secretary of State for Home Department. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 4:08 pm
The Transparency Project Blog has a post analysing the recent “civil partnership case”, R v Secretary of State for International Development [2018] UKSC 32. [read post]
31 May 2018, 7:17 am
” More recently, the court in its 1974 decision in Schick v. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 11:24 pm
Free Speech Paternalism and Free Speech Exceptionalism: Pervasive Distrust of Government and the Contemporary First Amendment , Ohio State Law Journal, Vol. 76, 2015, U of Alabama Legal Studies Research Paper No. 26557000, Ronald J. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:52 pm
Permission was granted and an appeal, principally focused on meaning, was heard by Sharp and McFarlane LJJs and Sir John Laws. [read post]
