Search for: "McGEE v. UNITED STATES" Results 61 - 80 of 91
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2009, 1:49 pm
United States: The LA Times, the Chicago Sun Times, NBC Chicago, and the AP report on the news that the Court will not hear an appeal of the conviction of a doctor who allegedly shot a nurse to prevent her from testifying against him in a Medicare fraud case. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
”Id. at 1141-42 (various citations omitted).Courts in other states following this general approach are:  Haygood v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:38 am
  A “home” can be a single family dwelling, a 2-4 family home, a manufactured home, a condo unit,  or a residential coop unit. [read post]
19 May 2016, 1:32 pm by Lathrop B. Nelson, III
As tipees get further down the chain from the insider, the government faces an increasingly difficult task in proving the requisite knowledge of this benefit, particularly in light of the Second Circuit’s decision clarifying this requirement in United States v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 1:32 pm by Lathrop B. Nelson, III
As tipees get further down the chain from the insider, the government faces an increasingly difficult task in proving the requisite knowledge of this benefit, particularly in light of the Second Circuit’s decision clarifying this requirement in United States v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
This time, it was Nigel’s nephew, Clotted Cream McGee, who almost pulled off a fast one by changing the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution to declare that governments cannot deprive any person of “life, liberty, or wifeswapping ” without due process of law. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 8:30 am
McGee brought back nightmares of my first-day recitation of Pennoyer v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 4:48 pm by Simon Chester
Khalid 2010 ONCA 861 United States of America v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 10:34 am by Beck, et al.
Because those are federal statutes, they can’t be “preempted” the way state-law claims were in Buckman Co. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm by Bexis
Rather:A federal court may act as a judicial pioneer when interpreting the United States Constitution and federal law. . . . [read post]