Search for: "McGuire v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 335
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am
The first two cases, Bostock v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 7:30 am
Lone Oak Club, LLC (No. 18-0264) Water Law Ladonna Degan; Ric Terrones; John McGuire; Reed Higgins; Mike Gurley; Larry Eddington; Steven McBride v. the Board of Trustees of the Dallas Police and Fire Pension System (No. 19-0234) Public Employees • State Constitution Wednesday Sep 18 San Antonio River Authority v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
Supreme Court granted the appointing authority’s motion to dismiss Trainee’s petition and Trainee appealed.Sustaining the Supreme Court’s decision, the Appellate Division said that Trainee had no greater rights than those of probationary employees, and a probationary employee, consistent with the limitation set out by the Court of Appeals in York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, "may be discharged for any or no reason at all in the absence of a showing that [the]… [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 10:16 am
Hill, McGuire, and Wiener. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
" In York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, the Court of Appeals set out the basic rule concerning the dismissal of probationary employees as follows: “After completing his or her minimum period of probation and prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation, a probationary employee can be dismissed without a hearing and without a statement of reasons, as long as there is no proof that the dismissal was done for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, or in… [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
" In York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, the Court of Appeals set out the basic rule concerning the dismissal of probationary employees as follows: “After completing his or her minimum period of probation and prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation, a probationary employee can be dismissed without a hearing and without a statement of reasons, as long as there is no proof that the dismissal was done for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, or in… [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 4:11 am
They had also provided further evidence showing that document D2 was not state of the art. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
In York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, the Court of Appeals set out the basic rule concerning the dismissal of probationary employees as follows: “After completing his or her minimum period of probation* and prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation, a probationary employee can be dismissed without a hearing and without a statement of reasons, as long as there is no proof that the dismissal was done for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, or in violation… [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
In York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, the Court of Appeals set out the basic rule concerning the dismissal of probationary employees as follows: “After completing his or her minimum period of probation* and prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation, a probationary employee can be dismissed without a hearing and without a statement of reasons, as long as there is no proof that the dismissal was done for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, or in violation… [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 10:37 am
" New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
"* See Matter of McCambridge v McGuire, 62 NY2d 563. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
"* See Matter of McCambridge v McGuire, 62 NY2d 563. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Smith v Kunkel, 152 AD2d 893, concerned the issue of an employer’s refusal to permit an employee to withdraw a resignation following its delivery to the appropriate appointing authority.Smith, a permanent state employee with the State Division of Equalization and Assessment, submitted his resignation for “personal reasons. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Smith v Kunkel, 152 AD2d 893, concerned the issue of an employer’s refusal to permit an employee to withdraw a resignation following its delivery to the appropriate appointing authority.Smith, a permanent state employee with the State Division of Equalization and Assessment, submitted his resignation for “personal reasons. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 6:51 am
To the extent that our earlier decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 11:00 am
Mayes, 236 S.W.3d 754, 758 (Tex. 2007); and McGuire v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 3:39 pm
McGuire was not exactly an opponent of gun control. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 9:42 pm
In that widely debated opinion in Commonwealth v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 8:38 am
The title of Judge Bledsoe’s Opinion in Carolina Home Solutions 1, Inc. v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 11:13 am
For example, the majority and separate opinions in Jesner v. [read post]
