Search for: "McGuire v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 89
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2015, 8:29 am by Mack Sperling
Federal courts used to recognize "manifest disregard of the law" as an additional common law basis for vacatur, but that ground for challenging an Award was cast into doubt by the United States Supreme Court in Hall Street Associates, LLC v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 11:17 am by Mack Sperling
United States Forest Service, 87 F.3d 339, 343 (9th Cir. 1996) ; Cray Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 1:01 pm
App. 484, 489, 364 S.E.2d 444, 447–48 (1988), involved allegations of securities fraud, and its underlying rationale was eliminated by the United States Supreme Court in Central Bank of Denver v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 4:16 pm by Wendy McGuire Coats
Wendy McGuire Coats will be attending the oral arguments as part of the Ninth’s continuing coverage of the United States’ litigation challenging Arizona’s enforcement of SB 1070. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 8:08 am
McGuire, etc., et al., United States Circuit Court of Appeals, 3d Cir., April 1, 2008 [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 8:24 am by Lissa Griffin
United States, in which the court upheld the application of issue preclusion to bar relitigation of mistried counts when a defendant was acquitted of some counts and the jury hung on others. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 6:23 am
United States, 424 U.S. 800 (1976) and its progeny, the defendants seek to stay this action pending the resolution of a related proceeding in New York state court. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 2:14 pm by Jeff Gamso
Brennan of the United States Supreme Court stated in Furman v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 11:18 am by JD Hull
Stern predicts that, in a new Florida case before Supreme Court, the Court's holding in Citizens United v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am by Blog Editorial
  Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]