Search for: "McKay v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 115
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2014, 6:13 am
“Like any other county employee, Plaintiff was required to comply with legitimate directions given by her supervisors, and her request for FMLA leave did not shelter her from this obligation, even when her supervisors’ instructions were related in some way to her use of FMLA leave,” the appeals court wrote, affirming the district court’s grant of summary judgment in the county’s favor (Dalpiaz v Carbon County, Utah, July 25, 2014, McKay, M). [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 5:57 am
Bank v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 5:19 am
What does Invisible Man say about the culture of the United States on the eve of Brown? [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:37 am
McKay, 376 S.W.3d 891, 899 n.9 (Tex. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:01 pm
Solo v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 4:20 am
A similar dynamic occurred in the First Amendment context in 2010’s Holder v. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
In R. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 8:11 am
The decision of R. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 7:19 am
In the recent decision (McKay v. [read post]
25 Sep 2012, 3:49 am
McKay v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am
Phone hacking: Simon Mckay, solicitor advocate, has an interesting post with an alternative angle on the Culture, Media and Sport select committee report, questioning MPs’ condemnation of Rupert Murdoch. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 7:22 am
Miles, III, spells out exactly how the Stored Communications Act could apply to employers requesting Facebook passwords: In Pietrylo v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 8:30 am
2010AP3002-CR State v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 4:04 pm
The state of libel litigation in England and Wales in 2011 can be summarised like this: no jury trials, not much media involvement and similar numbers of cases to 2010. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm
Statements in Open Court and Apologies Media interest in privacy injunctions was revived with Imogen Thomas’ statement in open court in the case of CTB v NGN, which stated the claimant footballer had accepted there was no basis to accuse her of blackmail. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 9:14 am
http://j.st/GqZ United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 4:38 am
Taxpayers also argued that the judgment should be vacated under United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 8:20 am
Like all states, Wisconsin has a rape shield rule. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 7:06 am
In McKay v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 3:10 am
McKay, Helen E. [read post]
