Search for: "McKee v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 156
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2024, 7:39 pm by Mark Graber
 The specter of Dunning School history haunted oral argument in Anderson v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 6:21 am by Kirk M. Hartung
In a short, four page, precedential opinion issued on October 4, 2021, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that design patents are limited to specific articles of  manufacture, and not a design in the abstract. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 5:07 am
The opinion is the latest in a string of Doyle violations found by the Third Circuit (United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 2:15 pm by Ron Krauss
While reiterating its general rule that mandamus is “a drastic remedy that is seldom issued and its use is discouraged,” the Third Circuit nevertheless found “the kind of extraordinary situation in which we are empowered to issue the writ of mandamus,” in United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 10:00 pm
Until recently, the law had been settled that any sale (within the United States) of a product that included claimed features of an invention is prior art, even if the sale did not publicly disclose those claimed features. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 9:07 am
Here is how the opinion in Grier (which I cannot yet find on can now be found at this link on the Third Circuit's website) begins:The Supreme Court held in United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 3:32 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
"Yes, there was a dissent [ ROTH, Circuit Judge, dissenting, with whom McKEE, Chief Judge. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 10:00 pm
McClary, Case No. 16-15794 in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit and can be read here. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
This would result in the individual having attained "instant tenure" in the position in view of the fact that case law provides that a probationary employee is entitled to "notice and hearing" in the event the appointing authority wishes to terminate the individual during his or her minimum period of probation [see McKee v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
This would result in the individual having attained "instant tenure" in the position in view of the fact that case law provides that a probationary employee is entitled to "notice and hearing" in the event the appointing authority wishes to terminate the individual during his or her minimum period of probation [see McKee v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:40 am by Joseph M. Hallman
In support, Judge Newman notes that in United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 9:25 am by Gregory Lars Gunnerson
A similar timeline for responding is already employed by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for responding to Office actions issued during examination of patent applications, however the procedure of requesting extensions of time is quite different. [read post]