Search for: "McMahon v. McMahon" Results 1 - 20 of 323
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2021, 6:05 am by Howard Friedman
Mariner, Shifting Standards of Judicial Review during the Coronavirus Pandemic in the United States, (22 (6) German Law Journal 1039-1059 (2021).Thomas McMahon, The Great Commission, Papal Bulls and the Doctrine of Discovery: from the 4th Century to Current Law, (August 26, 2021).Josh Blackman, The Irrepressible Myth of Jacobson v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 6:27 am by zamansky
District Judge Colleen McMahon of the Southern District of New York recently approved a $4.7 million settlement for the class of IBM workers in the case of Jander v. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 11:33 am by Jonathan Holbrook
App. 2016) (unpublished) (“even if McMahon was an innocent agent, Ball would be legally accountable if he or his accomplice friend caused McMahon to unwittingly take possession of the heroin”). [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 9:45 am by fjhinojosa
Loewy’s article Statutory Rape in a Post Lawrence V. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Karlin v McMahon, 96 NY2d 842, and Public Officers Law §87[2], the Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court's ruling, noting that "All government records are presumptively open for public inspection unless specifically exempt from disclosure" by state or federal statute. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Karlin v McMahon, 96 NY2d 842, and Public Officers Law §87[2], the Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court's ruling, noting that "All government records are presumptively open for public inspection unless specifically exempt from disclosure" by state or federal statute. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 4:05 am
And in reliance of its determination, the court principally cited to the case of Kirsh v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 4:05 am
And in reliance of its determination, the court principally cited to the case of Kirsh v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 4:05 am
And in reliance of its determination, the court principally cited to the case of Kirsh v. [read post]