Search for: "McMillan v. McMillan"
Results 61 - 80
of 263
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2023, 6:49 pm
Introduction In a recent decision of Kremler v Simon Fraser University, 2023 BCSC 805 dismissing an application for an interlocutory injunction, the British Columbia Supreme Court confirms the high threshold that an applicant is required to meet in relation to the merits of their claim on such an application. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 10:44 am
In DNR Restoration Inc. v Trac Developments Inc. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 7:18 am
The decision in McMillan v. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 12:58 pm
However, in the case of Ghermezian v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 8:20 am
In McMillan v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 11:22 am
But today in Turner v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 8:29 am
Williams v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:40 pm
McMillan v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:27 am
Merriwether Co. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 11:17 am
Expanding the Scope of Offenses Covered
Prior to this announcement, the Integrity Provisions only imposed certification requirements on bidders and their affiliates who were convicted of the following offenses3: (i) frauds against the government under the Criminal Code of Canada; (ii) offenses under the Financial Administration Act; (iii) payments of a contingency fee to a person to whom the Lobbying Act applies; (iv) money laundering; (v) criminal offenses under the… [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 9:51 am
Class actions certifications in British Columbia have continued to surge for consumer claims arising from product liability, privacy breaches, misleading advertising, and price-fixing competition claims. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 7:36 am
See United States v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 10:21 am
Circuit in Hamdan v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 12:01 pm
© McMillan LLP 2023 The post Is the Sun Setting on Perceived DAO “Immunity”? [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 8:00 am
Women First OB/GYN Associates, LLC v. [read post]
15 Sep 2018, 7:30 pm
BNSF Railway Co. (10th Cir., August 17, 2018) (affirming summary judgment in favor of BNSF, but remanding on plaintiffs' ADA and retaliation claims)*McMillan v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:14 pm
Davis v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 1:54 pm
” The suit was EEOC v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
This excerpt chronicles Donald’s journey to defend Mi’kmaw treaty rights in the Supreme Court of Canada and sets the stage for understanding the impacts of R. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 9:49 pm
Vonage).The Ninth Circuit has dealt with this issue once in an unpublished decision (Stollenwerk v. [read post]
