Search for: "McMullen v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 28
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2014, 12:42 pm
  The Eighth Circuit affirmed, quoting McMullen, because “[e]ven if federal law allowed” the defendant to do what plaintiffs demanded, “any state law imposing an additional requirement is preempted. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 7:54 am by Randall Hodgkinson
Deanna Gilley, No. 99,156 (Reno)State v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 1:51 pm
Hogan shogan@ausley.com Ausley & McMullen Matthew MacNamara MMacnamara@ausley.com Ausley & McMullen [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:04 am by NL
That decision led eventually to the order His Honour Judge McMullen QC of 26 July 2010. [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:04 am by NL
That decision led eventually to the order His Honour Judge McMullen QC of 26 July 2010. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 3:35 pm
Lohr, 518 U.S. 470, 495 (1996) (state duty must be "identical" to the corresponding existing federal requirements for a plaintiff to survive preemption); see also McMullen v. [read post]