Search for: "McNEIL v. UNITED STATES" Results 81 - 100 of 159
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2011, 7:10 pm by Kiera Flynn
Petition for certiorari Amicus brief of America’s Health Insurance Plans Amicus brief of Landmark Legal Foundation Amicus brief of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America Amicus brief of Family Research Council   Harvey v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 7:13 am by Donna Eng
  Now that the notice of appeal has finally been filed, the case is heading to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:13 pm by Phil Cave
A pending petition in United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:12 pm by Viking
A pending petition in United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 12:00 pm by Bexis
  See Tang, slip op. at 7-9.Still, some enterprising lawyers tried to make that litigation the latest Chinese export to the United States. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 1:22 pm by Terry Lenamon / Reba Kennedy
McNeil, involved a petition for writ of habeas corpus, filed as Case No. 08-14402 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Miami Division. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 12:00 pm by Donna Eng
  If the Court maintains its ruling, and the State of Florida appeals to the Eleventh Circuit, as Attorney General Pam Bondi has stated will likely be done, such an appeal could set the stage for the case to make its way to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 11:16 am by Donna Eng
McNeil, 08-14402-CIV-JEM, concluding that Florida’s death penalty procedure violates the United States Supreme Court case of Ring v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 6:12 am by Brian A. Comer
A Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) unit was ordered by a South Carolina judge to pay more than $327 million in penalties for deceptively marketing the antipsychotic drug Risperdal as safer and better than competing medicines.J&J’s Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals unit repeatedly violated the state’s consumer-protection laws by sending a 2003 letter to doctors touting Risperdal as superior to rival drugs and including deceptive information in the… [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 7:50 pm by cdw
” [via Tim Cone @ Defense Newsletter Blog]   Other United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 5:02 am by Brian A. Comer
“After the judge makes a determination as to damages, we will consider our options,” Panico said in his statement.The case is State of South Carolina v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:08 am by Brian A. Comer
Risperdal is different from other antipsychotic medicines and “doctors needed to know that,” he added.Jurors will begin deliberating the case tomorrow.The case is State of South Carolina v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 1:41 pm by Big Tent Democrat
Discon, Inc., 525 U.S. 128 (1998), the Supreme Court of the United States stated that: [P]recedent limits the per se rule in the boycott context to cases involving horizontal agreements among direct competitors. [. . .] [read post]