Search for: "McNeil v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 282
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2010, 1:20 pm by Bexis
Levine involved a traditional state-law claim and did not affect the inability of state-law plaintiffs to sue over FDCA violations having no parallel in state law.Lofton v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 4:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
(See Di Ponzio v Riordan, 89 NY2d 578 [1997]; Basso v Miller, 40NY2d 233 (1976); Jaume v Ry Mgt. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 4:02 pm
Where an ad is literally false, the court has the power enjoin the use without reference to the impact of the ad on the buying public (McNeil-PCC v Bristol-Myers Squibb)(1991)). [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 8:14 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Bayer Schering, 575 F.3d at 1347 (citing O’Farrell, 853 F.2d at 903); see also Ortho-McNeil, 520 F.3d at 1364 (stating the number of options must be “small or easily traversed”). [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 12:15 am
The Court's more recent 1991 ruling in McNeil v. [read post]