Search for: "Mcmillan v. Barker" Results 1 - 1 of 1
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2012, 10:48 am by David Cheifetz
On the other hand, in the trial judge's defence, what he said could be Ontario law given Barker v Montfort Hospital, where the majority said (the dissenting judge might well have agreed with this point if she thought it necessary to say so) that Resurfice "did not alter the state of the law on causation".[16] The trial judge did not cite Barker. [read post]