Search for: "Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory" Results 21 - 40 of 65
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2008, 6:00 pm
The case arose after Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory (KAPL), faced with significant budget cuts, laid off thirty-one workers. [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 2:53 pm
Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory, the National Government ordered its contractor, Knolls, to reduce its work force. [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 2:53 pm
Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory, the National Government ordered its contractor, Knolls, to reduce its work force. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 11:03 pm
Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory, the Supreme Court ruled that the burden of proving that any termination having a disparate impact on older workers was based on reasonable factors, falls on employers. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 9:14 pm
Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory holding that an employer defending a disparate impact claim under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) bears the burden of persuading the factfinder that its use of "reasonable factors other than age" (RFOA) was reasonable. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 9:02 pm
Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory, setting forth its interpretation of the burden of proof in such cases. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 8:34 pm
Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory, involved a reduction in force at a government contractor that designs naval nuclear reactors. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 7:38 pm
Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory (06-1505), reported here. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 7:34 pm
Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory, involved a reduction in force at a government contractor that designs naval nuclear reactors. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 3:09 pm
Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory (06-1505) is available here. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 3:05 pm
Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory, No. 06-1505. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 2:04 pm
Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory (06-1505) by a vote of 7-1, with the dissent only a partial one. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 11:50 am
Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory (06-1505), on whether, in a disparate impact suit under the ADEA, workers or employers bear the burden of persuasion in determining whether the employment decision was based on "reasonable factors other than age. [read post]