Search for: "Melcher v. Greenberg Traurig, LLP" Results 1 - 16 of 16
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2018, 4:49 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Surely the longest running Judiciary Law§ 487 case known to man, Melcher v Greenberg Traurig LLP  2018 NY Slip Op 06310  Decided on September 27, 2018  Appellate Division, First Department has been modified and sent back to Supreme Court for trial. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 3:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  A recall of that decision is understandable, since the Court of Appeals decided Melcher v Greenberg Traurig, LLP   2014 NY Slip Op 02213   Decided on April 1, 2014  Court of Appeals  Read, J. on April 1, 2014. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 4:43 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 Melcher v Greenberg Traurig, LLP  2014 NY Slip Op 02213 [23 NY3d 10] . [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 3:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Greenberg Traurig LLP, holds that it is 6 years, as did the Court of Appeals. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 4:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In Melcher v Greenberg Traurig LLP  2014 NY Slip Op 51296(U)  Decided on August 19, 2014  Supreme Court, New York County  Sherwood, J. we see the denial of a request to transfer or assign interests to an entity. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 3:18 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Melcher v Greenberg Traurig, LLP   2013 NY Slip Op 00256   Decided on January 17, 2013 Appellate Division, First Department  is extraordinary. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 4:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Today, she wrote the opinion that decides the statute of limitations for Judicary Law 487 in Melcher v Greenberg Traurig, LLP   2014 NY Slip Op 02213   Decided on April 1, 2014   Court of Appeals Read, J. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Although plaintiffs were aware of the alleged misconduct during the pendency of the prior foreclosure action, they are not precluded from bringing a plenary action alleging a violation of Judiciary Law § 487 provided that they are not collaterally attacking the judgment from the prior action (see Melcher v Greenberg Traurig LLP, 135 AD3d 547, 554 [2016]; Chevron Corp. v Donziger, 871 F Supp 2d 229, 261-262 [2012]; see… [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 4:35 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Judiciary Law § 487 exposes an attorney who [i]s guilty of any deceit or collusion . . . with intent to deceive the court or any party’ to criminal (misdemeanor) liability and treble damages, to be recovered by the injured party in a civil action” (Melcher v Greenberg Traurig, LLP, [*2]23 NY3d 10, 12-13, quoting Judiciary Law § 487[1]). [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 4:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Greenberg Traurig,LLP, 23NY3d19, 988NYS2d101, 11NE3d174,reargumentdenied 23 NY3d 998, 992 NYS2d 763, 16 NE3d 1241 [2014]). [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 3:15 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 . required by law to [be] disclose[d]" (see Melcher v Greenberg Traurig, LLP, 102 AD3d 497, 500 [1st Dept 2013], revd on other grounds 23 NY3d 10 [2014]). [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 2:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The absence of such information in Levine's interpleader pleading does not rise to the level of "withholding of crucial information from a court" or "conceal[ing] from a court . . . a fact . . . required by law to [be] disclose[d]" (see Melcher v Greenberg Traurig, LLP, 102 AD3d 497 [1st Dept 2013], revd on other grounds __ NY3d __ [2014]). [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 4:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
These allegations generally state causes of action sounding in legal malpractice (see Nomura Asset Capital Corp. v Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, 26 NY3d at 49; Rules of Professional Conduct [22 NYCRR 1200.0] rule 1.15 [c] [4]), and violation of Judiciary Law § 487 (see Melcher v Greenberg Traurig, LLP, 23 NY3d 10, 14 [2014]; cf. [read post]
23 May 2018, 3:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
These allegations generally state causes of action sounding in legal malpractice (see Nomura Asset Capital Corp. v Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, 26 NY3d at 49; Rules of Professional Conduct [22 NYCRR 1200.0] rule 1.15 [c] [4]), and violation of Judiciary Law § 487 (see Melcher v Greenberg Traurig, LLP, 23 NY3d 10, 14 [2014]; cf. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 3:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
These allegations generally state causes of action sounding in legal malpractice (see Nomura Asset Capital Corp. v Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, 26 NY3d at 49; Rules of Professional Conduct [22 NYCRR 1200.0)] rule 1.15[c][4]), and violation of Judiciary Law § 487 (see Melcher v Greenberg Traurig, LLP, 23 NY3d 10, 14; cf. [read post]