Search for: "Melendez v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 249
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2009, 2:30 pm
Massachusetts OUI lawyers will continue to raise Sixth Amendment confrontation issues to challenge the admission of breathalyzer evidence at trial in light of the United States Supreme Court's decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 2:01 pm
The United States Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Argument Preview: Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 1:52 pm by Dwight Sullivan
  Here are the granted issues in United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 1:31 am
Massachusetts, under the unique circumstances of the case, the admission of the drug lab report did not constitute plain error, in United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 10:37 am
Two recent cases from New Mexico's Supreme Court apply the recent United States Supreme Court decision of Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 5:55 am by Brian Shiffrin
As we have previously written, in 2004, the United States Supreme Court, in Crawford v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 10:43 pm by Richard D. Friedman
The certificate cannot be admitted consistently with the Confrontation Clause unless a witness with personal knowledge – presumably but not necessarily the author of the certificate – testifies to both propositions.A recent opinion usefully summarizing the decisions on this matter, and coming to the proper result, is United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 11:59 am by Dane Johnson
The Supreme Court of the United States tells the government that the Confrontation Clause does still exist. [read post]
8 Nov 2008, 9:54 pm
Solicitor General, will argue for the United States as amicus. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 10:15 pm by Michael DelSignore
Deniz overturned a conviction of drug trafficking relying on the Melendez-Diaz decision of the United States Supreme Court to hold that the Commonwealth failed to prove the weight of the narcotics and that the substance was in fact an illegal narcotic. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 2:52 am by Michael DelSignore
The SJC rejected this argument and held that the defendant was entitled to a new trial based on the United States Supreme Court decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]