Search for: "Melendez v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 168
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2011, 1:52 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Here are the granted issues in United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 10:37 am
Two recent cases from New Mexico's Supreme Court apply the recent United States Supreme Court decision of Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 5:55 am by Brian Shiffrin
As we have previously written, in 2004, the United States Supreme Court, in Crawford v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 10:43 pm by Richard D. Friedman
The certificate cannot be admitted consistently with the Confrontation Clause unless a witness with personal knowledge – presumably but not necessarily the author of the certificate – testifies to both propositions.A recent opinion usefully summarizing the decisions on this matter, and coming to the proper result, is United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 11:59 am by Dane Johnson
The Supreme Court of the United States tells the government that the Confrontation Clause does still exist.  [read post]
17 May 2011, 6:59 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Here’s audio of today’s CAAF argument in United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 10:15 pm by Michael DelSignore
Deniz overturned a conviction of drug trafficking relying on the Melendez-Diaz decision of the United States Supreme Court to hold that the Commonwealth failed to prove the weight of the narcotics and that the substance was in fact an illegal narcotic. [read post]
8 Nov 2008, 9:54 pm
Solicitor General, will argue for the United States as amicus. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 2:52 am by Michael DelSignore
The SJC rejected this argument and held that the defendant was entitled to a new trial based on the United States Supreme Court decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 5:12 am by Michael DelSignore
In the recent landmark United States Supreme Court confrontation clause decisions, Justice Stevens voted with the majority in both Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 1:48 pm
See SCOTUSBlog coverage here and opinion here.I think CAAF will need to re-look at the rule in United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 1:20 pm by Stephen Neyman, P.C.
As the case was pending discretionary review from the New Mexico Supreme Court, the United States Supreme Court issued its Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 11:53 am by Dwight Sullivan
First came last term’s CAAF decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 5:13 pm by Brian Shiffrin
In Melendez-Diaz v Massachusetts (129 S.Ct. 2527 [June 25, 2009]), the United States Supreme Court held that the Confrontation Clause requires that in order for the prosecution to be able to introduce a forensic laboratory report at trial, the prosecutor must present a live witness to testify to the truth of the statements made in the report subject to cross-examination. [read post]