Search for: "Mental Patient Civil Liberties v. Hospital Staff"
Results 1 - 10
of 10
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2010, 9:20 pm
The trust argued that applying Osman to mental health care would conflict with other obligations of medical staff to their patients and encourage them to be too restrictive of patients’ liberty for fear that they might commit suicide. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 10:55 pm
If patients were de facto detained, outside the provisions of the Mental Health Act or the Mental Capacity Act deprivation of liberty safeguards, there may be a case to answer for unlawful detention or false imprisonment. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 1:03 pm
Modaresi v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 10:30 pm
However, following a meeting between TM, his solicitor and the hospital staff, it was agreed that the claimant would remain in hospital. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:18 am
” Data privacy and data protection The Irish Times reports that the Irish Council for Civil Liberties has said that Facebook parent Meta cannot comply with new EU data laws. [read post]
8 May 2018, 7:30 am
Some take mental, psychological, and developmental disabilities into account, while others do not, and some automatically rule out persons with disabilities. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am
The courts expanded the meaning of right to life and liberty guaranteed under article 21 of the Constitution. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
The document was published on 14 December 2006 and the consultation period closed on 7 March 2007.The position of prisoners on remand is covered by the Representation of the People Act 2000.Contents1 Background 2 The position in other countries 3 Lobbying for change 4 ECHR decision: Hirst v the United Kingdom 5 The Government's response to the ECHR ruling 6 ECHR appeal decision 7 Consultation on prisoners' voting rights 8 The Government's proposed options for changing the law… [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am
David Meyer-Lindenberg crosses Chairman of the Board of Cato Institute, Robert Levy. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm
In this regard, Para 3.4 (v) of the said Manual reads as follows:"(v) In cases of alleged sex offences such as intercourse with a female child, forcible rape, indecent liberties or perversion, it is important that the victim, as well as the accused, be made available for interview and polygraph examination. [read post]
