Search for: "Merchants' Bank v. State Bank" Results 81 - 100 of 321
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jul 2007, 4:42 pm
Fortunately for defendants, an earlier state case, Emery v. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 2:30 am by UKSC Blog
Barclays Bank plc v Various Claimants, heard 28 November 2019. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 4:30 am by David Kravets
Strangely, in those 10 states, merchants may offer "cash" discounts. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 7:42 pm by Adam Levitin
Just as there are small banks and credit unions involved, so too are small merchants lined up. [read post]
16 May 2016, 5:31 pm
The decision overturns the California Supreme Court decision in Discover Bank v. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 2:14 pm by Jane Coleman
One of the three defendants, Durango Merchant Services acted as a middleman, while the other two, Frontline Processing Corporation and Woodforest National Bank, provided credit card processing services to the merchant. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 6:58 am
SunTrust Banks, Inc., No. 10-11912 (11th Cir. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 3:00 am by Jane Coleman
One of the three defendants, Durango Merchant Services acted as a middleman, while the other two, Frontline Processing Corporation and Woodforest National Bank, provided credit card processing services to the merchant. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 12:02 pm by John L. Culhane, Jr.
The American Bankers Association, American Financial Services Association, California Financial Services Association, and Consumer Bankers Association have filed a joint amicus brief with the California Supreme Court in Pulliam v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 7:35 am by Kristian Soltes
’s V 2.65% $5.3 billion deal to acquire Plaid Inc., a key player in the financial-technology space. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 1:15 pm by Guest Author
Corner Post is a regulatory beneficiary – a merchant customer of regulated banks – claiming that the Federal Reserve has regulated the banks too lightly. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
Pa. 1985) (can’t tell what state’s law); Seiden v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  A plaintiff whose PII, PFI, or PPI was stolen by hackers typically brings suit against the hacked company on his or her own behalf and on behalf of a class of similarly situated people, hoping the presiding court will certify the proposed class and allow the case to proceed as a class action.[3]  Causes of action in customer cases run a wide gamut of legal theories, from traditional tort claims (negligence and fraud) to allegations of state and federal statutory violations (for… [read post]