Search for: "Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson" Results 21 - 40 of 80
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2011, 1:27 pm
Supreme Court first clearly defined sexual harassment hostile environment cases as illegal in Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 11:22 am by Resnick Law Group, P.C.
It has included sexual harassment since the Supreme Court’s 1986 decision in Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 11:43 am
The question remains whether the Ellerth/Faragher encouragement of employer preventative policies, which may be merely symbolic and ineffective, exists in tension with the Meritor savings Bank v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 2:52 am
The Appellate Division said that for Brennan to prevail on her claim of a hostile work environment she must show that she was subjected to harassment based on her sexual orientation and that the harassment was so severe or pervasive as to “alter the conditions of [her] employment and create an abusive working environment,” citing Meritor Savings Bank v Vinson, 477 US 57, 67. [read post]
1 May 2019, 7:00 am by Phillips & Associates
Supreme Court first recognized sexual harassment as a violation of federal antidiscrimination law in Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 10:17 am by Resnick Law Group, P.C.
Supreme Court recognized sexual harassment as a form of sex discrimination in Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
26 May 2018, 5:13 am by SHG
The ACLU sent a letter to express its view: In Meritor Savings Bank v Vinson, 477 U.S. 57 (1986), the Supreme Court defined actionable sexual harassment as harassment that “must be sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the conditions of [the victim’s] employment and create an abusive working environment. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 11:01 am by Phillips & Associates
Supreme Court first recognized sexual harassment as sex discrimination in Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 9:56 am by Phillips & Associates
Supreme Court first recognized sexual harassment as sex discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 in Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]