Search for: "Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson" Results 41 - 60 of 73
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2008, 3:37 pm
 On the other hand, mere utterance of a joke or other inappropriate remarks by a co-worker may not sufficiently affect conditions to create a hostile environment as noted in Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:09 am by Phillips & Associates
Supreme Court first recognized sexual harassment as a type of sex discrimination prohibited by Title VII in Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:03 am
Supreme Court addressed the issue in its landmark 1986 decision in Meritor Savings Bank v Vinson, 477 U.S. 57, in which the justices declared that sexual harassment is a form of sex discrimination prohibited by Title VII. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 9:32 pm by admin
And, according to the 1986 Supreme Court case Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 12:15 pm by Phillips & Associates
Supreme Court first recognized sexual harassment as a form of sex discrimination under Title VII more than thirty years ago in Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 5:08 am by SHG
In the 1986 case Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 4:22 am by SHG
That has been the case ever since Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 7:27 am by Phillips & Associates
Sexual harassment did not acquire formal legal recognition as a form of unlawful sex discrimination for another 22 years, when the Supreme Court issued its decision in Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 3:40 am by SHG
As the Davis Court acknowledged by citing Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 4:00 am
Sexual misconduct directly linked to the grant or denial of an economic quid pro quo where "such conduct has the purpose or effect of unreasonably interfering with an individual's work performance or creating an intimidating, hostile, or offensive working environment [Meritor Savings Bank v Vinson, 477 US 57]; and2. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The Supreme Court began building out sexual harassment law from a Title VII case in 1986, Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
It matters even more under Massachusetts law, which provides greater protection to employees than does federal law.Let’s consider liability for sexual harassment under federal law first.In the Supreme Court’s first harassment case, Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]