Search for: "Metropolitan Life Insurance Co" Results 1 - 20 of 140
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2016, 6:16 am by Mark S. Humphreys
It is a 1992, 5th Circuit opinion styled, Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 7:11 pm
The case, against Metropolitan Insurance Co. and John Crane, says that false and misleading reports were published in order to maintain a favorable atmosphere for the continued sale, use and distribution of asbestos. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 6:54 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This question is answered in the 1992, Fifth Circuit opinion styled, Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 8:00 am
Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., A.2d ----, 2007 WL 2048931 (Pa.) [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 2:00 pm by Gerry W. Beyer
Teixeira, refused to allow Metropolitan Life Insurance Company to remove itself from a litigation triangle between the company and a decedent’s wife and girlfriend. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 6:29 am
Frederick MotzHeld: Summary judgment granted to defendant insurance company, MetLife, because it did not abuse its discretion under ERISA in terminating plaintiff's long term disability ("LTD") benefits based on the reports of independent consultant physicians who reviewed plaintiff's medical records and did not do their own vocational review or actual physical examination of the plaintiff.Facts: In March 2007, the plaintiff submitted a claim for LTD benefits under his… [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 3:06 pm by Hunton & Williams LLP
On January 24, 2011, Connecticut Attorney General George Jepsen and Consumer Protection Commissioner William Rubenstein announced that they had reached an Assurance of Voluntary Compliance (“AVC”) with Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 7:16 pm
EEOC and a 6-1-2 ruling on an ERISA issue in Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 9:24 pm
Co., 6 AD3d 975 [allegations of intentional misrepresentation concerning coverage of a insurance policy provided to plaintiff]; Brenkus v Metropolitan Life Ins. [read post]