Search for: "Metropolitan Life v. Massachusetts" Results 1 - 20 of 37
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2009, 9:54 am
Metropolitan Life - the court imposes, and bases its decision in favor (this time) of the participant/claimant on, certain limitations on that principle, finding that: While MetLife is not required to give deference to treating physicians, see e.g., Vlass v. [read post]
Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., et al., that addresses multiple issues, including statute of repose, strict liability and liability of a premises owner. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 9:24 pm
Co. of Am., 94 NY2d 330 ["out-of-pocket premium payments [for life insurance policies] would vanish within a stated period of time"]; Monter v Massachusetts Mut. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The National law Review had a piece “Australian Privacy Act Under Review” Canada In the case of Lethbridge and District Pro-Life Association v Lethbridge (City), 2020 ABQB 654 M David Gates J found that the City’s decision to ban a number of anti-abortion advertisements was unreasonable. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 7:36 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
Gardner 13-379Issue: Whether New York prevailing wage rates are minimum labor standards under Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am by Bexis
The court’s eagle eyes spied a Tennessee appellate court decision that rejected the argument that a person’s life was a “thing of value” under the Tennessee statute:[T]he General Assembly intended for the Consumer Protection Act to be used by a person claiming damages for an ascertainable loss of money or property due to an unfair or deceptive act or practice and not in a wrongful death action.2011 WL 1259650, at *3 (quoting Kirksey v. [read post]