Search for: "Meyer v. Grant" Results 61 - 80 of 443
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2013, 9:29 am by Joy Waltemath
In a sexual harassment class action against a retailer, a federal district court in Oregon looked to statutory intent and found that there is no duty to mitigate emotional damages under Title VII (EEOC v Fred Meyer Stores, Inc, DOr, September 19, 2013). [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:23 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Verdi v Jacoby & Meyers, LLP  2017 NY Slip Op 07294  Decided on October 18, 2017  Appellate Division, Second Department seems to be more about missed opportunities than anything else. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 1:00 pm
S157001 (review granted 11/14/07), it will address whether the CLRA applies to insurance, and in Meyer v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 7:01 am by John Steele
 Accordingly, the Second Circuit remanded the case to the district court with instructions to vacate the judgment and grant leave to amend. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 6:05 am
Larry Thomas of the New Albany Tribune reports on Wednesday's opinion in Robert Lynn Company, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 1:33 am
NEW YORK COUNTYLandlord/Tenant LawTenants Granted Rent Abatement For Bedbug Presence; Landlord Entitled to Final JudgmentBender v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 7:00 am
In the unpublished opinion of Lopez v Noa, B222183, filed July 29, 2011, the California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division 4, reversed the trial court and directed the court to grant the motion to compel arbitration. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 2:49 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
See Meyer Intellectual Props. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 10:00 am
The Court also granted unpublished habeas relief in various cases which you can check out for yourself here.The Court also issued a published opinion in the following case:Carlos Landrian v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In contrast, mandamus "does not lie to enforce a task or duty that is discretionary" as demonstrated by the decisions in Alliance to End Chickens as Kaporos v New York City Police Dept., 152 AD3d 113, affd 32 NY3d 1091, cert denied, 139 S Ct 2651; and  Matter of Meyer v Zucker, 185 AD3d 1265, lv denied 36 NY3d 904). [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In contrast, mandamus "does not lie to enforce a task or duty that is discretionary" as demonstrated by the decisions in Alliance to End Chickens as Kaporos v New York City Police Dept., 152 AD3d 113, affd 32 NY3d 1091, cert denied, 139 S Ct 2651; and  Matter of Meyer v Zucker, 185 AD3d 1265, lv denied 36 NY3d 904). [read post]