Search for: "Meyer v. Grant" Results 141 - 160 of 443
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2007, 12:28 pm
On April 18, 2007, the Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, in Coral Construction, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 1:31 am by Mark Summerfield
  This time the drug in question is ‘atypical’ antipsychotic aripiprazole, marketed by Bristol-Meyers Squibb (BMS) as ABILIFY, under license from the patentee Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. [read post]
The appellate court held that a district court applied an overly narrow reading of the Lanham Act in granting summary judgment to the retailer. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 9:14 am by Eric Goldman
The Sixth Circuit reversed the grant of summary judgment to Redbubble, sending the case back to the district court for further consideration of the facts. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 4:49 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
[USA] v Johnston, 145 AD3d 1240, 1240 [2016]; Matter of Barnes v Venettozzi, 135 AD3d 1250, 1251 [2016]; Rodriguez v Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, 126 AD3d 1183, 1184-1185 [2015], lv denied 25 NY3d 912 [2015]). [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 1:02 am
" The trial court acknowledged the concern for the juror's behavior, but chose not to grant the mistrial. [read post]
17 May 2013, 10:56 am
Verdiramo, Esq., Edward Meyer, Jr., and Victoria ChenCase number: 10-cv-1888 (United States District Court for the Southern District of New York)Case filed: March 10, 2010 Qualifying Judgment/Order: April 29, 2013 5/17/2013 8/15/2013 2013-44 Parker Drilling CompanyCase number: 13-cv-00461 (United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia)Case filed: April 16, 2013Qualifying… [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 5:13 am
Originally, the court of appeals reversed and remanded in an unpublished opinion, but that opinion was withdrawn when the court of appeals granted rehearing. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 12:54 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Sept. 19, 2017) Related posts: Judge Declines to Enforce Uber’s Terms of Service–Meyer v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
But saying that would have been advisory.I am, however, a little tickled that Judge Meyers didn't get upset that the State was so persuasive in getting discretionary review granted on one issue when both the majority and the concurring opinions seemed to suggest that Rule 702's applicability wasn't really crucial. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 10:07 am by R.J. MacReady
in it's resolution of Meyers's (and the majority's) concerns. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 4:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Given the [*2]absence of detailed facts, the legal malpractice cause of action should have been dismissed (see Janker v Silver, Forrester & Lesser, P.C., 135 AD3d 908, 910 [2016]; Rodriguez v Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, 126 AD3d at 1185-1186; Kreamer v Town of Oxford, 96 AD3d 1128, 1128 [2012]; compare Soule v Lozada, 232 AD2d 825, 825 [1996]). [read post]