Search for: "Meyers v. Price" Results 21 - 40 of 157
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2015, 2:36 am by Mark Summerfield
A court ruling has revealed that the Commonwealth of Australia (i.e. the Federal Government) is seeking to recover $60 million it considers has been ‘overpaid’ for the anti-clotting drug marketed by Sanofi (formerly Sanofi-Aventis) and Bristol-Meyers Squibb under the brand name PLAVIX: Commonwealth of Australia v Sanofi-Aventis [2015] FCA 384.Sanofi was the owner of Australian Patent No. 597784, which includes claims directed to the compound having the international… [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 7:01 am
[He still has a capital murder conviction as to the other victims.]Judges Price and Womack concurred to explain why they vote to overrule Norris v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 5:03 am
[Presumably this concurrence went to press before Price was able to read Arizona v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 2:01 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
See Judge Elsa Alcala's opinion (pdf) on behalf of the majority, a concurrence (pdf) from Judge Tom Price, and a dissent (pdf) from Judge Lawrence Meyers.The case - Wehrenberg v. [read post]