Search for: "Meyers v. State" Results 181 - 200 of 1,046
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2009, 4:26 pm
Mental Illness as a Bar to the Death Penalty There is already precedent from the United States Supreme Court (Ford v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 4:42 pm
Mullen was a Nebraska Catholic lawyer who won the tremendously important civil liberties case Meyer v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 7:46 am by B.W. Barnett
In an unflinching dissent, Judge Price (joined with Judges Meyers, Johnson, and Holcomb) stated: By dint of persistence, a plurality of the Court purports to overrule Clewis. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 10:07 am by R.J. MacReady
Judge Meyers first noted that the State must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that a defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his Miranda rights. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 7:09 am by Joy Waltemath
The state high court found that the trial court erroneously limited its analysis of joint employment status to the four factors outlined in the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Bonnette v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 6:31 am
Italy): On Right Outcomes and Wrong Terms Marco Calisto, Jurisdictional Immunities of the State: Germany v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 4:30 am by Unknown
As the Board stated in Meyers II, “the question of whether an employee has engaged in concerted activity is a factual one based on the totality of the record evidence. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
But saying that would have been advisory.I am, however, a little tickled that Judge Meyers didn't get upset that the State was so persuasive in getting discretionary review granted on one issue when both the majority and the concurring opinions seemed to suggest that Rule 702's applicability wasn't really crucial. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 5:57 am
That's what I thought until I read Mitchell v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:47 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Grits earlier examined the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals' recent Fourth Amendment jurisprudence for patterns and trends ("Divided Court of Criminal Appeals in flux"), and a commenter suggested the opinions in State v. [read post]