Search for: "Michael Abramowicz" Results 81 - 100 of 101
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2020, 5:26 pm by Michael Abramowicz
One advantage of using primaries to select nominees for President is that when the selection process takes place over time, it is easier for similarly-minded voters to coordinate on nominees. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 12:48 pm by Ilya Somin
Michael Abramowicz Oppenheim Professor of Law George Washington University Jonathan H. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 9:24 am by brianfrye
              Since then, the article has gotten considerable attention, including a thoughtful Volokh Conspiracy post titled “The Right to Unmarry: A Proposal Within a Proposal” by Michael Abramowicz, a Family Law Prof Blog post titled “Marriage Proposal in Family Law Scholarly Article” by Margaret Ryznar, and a lovely Legal Theory Blog post titled “Frye Proposed to Romero: The Right to Unmarry: A Proposal” by… [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 7:53 am by Guest Blogger
This debate continues to have terrific new contributions, such as by Michael Abramowicz (also attending our conference) and by Michael Burstein and Fiona Murray (who will be blogging about their new prizes paper soon), and prizes are also gaining ground in the popularpress. [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 6:55 am by JB
Over at Point of Order, Michael Stern responds to my account of the legislative history and original purposes of Section 4 of the Fourteenth Amendment, the Public Debt Clause.He asks three useful questions.First, why should we pay attention to Senator Wade's speech, which I claim explains the purposes behind section 4, when his proposal was not the final version? [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 7:56 pm by Guest Blogger
[8]I agree with Abramowicz and Duffy that the answer to this question is “yes, it would be surprising. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 6:29 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
So I agree with this section's overall conclusion, but it is not clear that the inventor stories from Part I can teach us anything about disclosure.Part III contains the most novel aspect of Lemley's argument: not only might races have some benefits (which has been suggested by others like John Duffy, Michael Abramowicz, and Suzanne Scotchmer), but racing might be the dominant normative justification for the patent system. [read post]
Michael Abramowicz is a Professor of Law at the George Washington University Law School.  [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 8:49 am by Dennis Crouch
  Sincerely, Michael Abramowicz (GWU); Martin J. [read post]
18 Nov 2012, 10:09 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Michael Risch said poor examination led to bad patents, but the problem will subside; we just need to tweak the current rules. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 4:55 pm by Dmitry Karshtedt
 Consider nonobviousness: Professors Michael Abramowicz and John Duffy and Judge Richard Posner have all argued that nonobvoiusness doctrine in its current form does not clearly serve the goal of inducing innovation that would not have been produced in the absence of the patent incentive. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 3:58 am by Embajador Microjuris al Día
Estos acercamientos serán considerados tras un examen de breves selecciones de dos ensayos: Michael Abramowicz, A Theory of Copyright’s Derivative Right and Related Doctrines, 90 Minn. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 10:09 am by Sarah Tran
Rev. 1035 (2003); Michael Abramowicz, Essay, En Banc Revisited, 100 Colum L. [read post]
25 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
 *    *    *“Randomizing Regulation”by Michael Abramowicz, George Washington University, Ian Ayres, Yale University, and Yair Listokin, Yale University (January 30)   If legislators disagree about the efficacy of a proposed policy, why not resolve the disagreement with a bet? [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 11:42 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Session 3: Licensing IModerator: Yonathan ArbelJonathan M. [read post]