Search for: "Michael Abramowicz"
Results 101 - 120
of 132
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2009, 1:31 pm
We are: Michael Abramowicz, Don Clarke, Larry Cunningham, Lisa Fairfax, Theresa Gabaldon, Scott Kieff, Jeff Manns, Dalia Mitchell, Larry Mitchell, and Art Wilmarth. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 3:12 am
Anthony Fauci is the target of a writerly hit job and I contribute to its correction [Tim Carney, Washington Examiner] Comparative federalism: Germany, with relatively decentralized, competitive, and local health care arrangements, offers lessons in tackling the crisis [Rob Schmitz, NPR (no central government approval needed for new diagnostic tests); Kai Weiss, CapX] This is not going to help: “Hospital Liability for Ventilator Shortages” [Michael Abramowicz] … [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 8:13 am
I've now read Michael Abramowicz's article (available only on pay services, I believe), and he does approach, but doesn't quite make, the current Section 4 argument. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 12:48 pm
Michael Abramowicz Oppenheim Professor of Law George Washington University Jonathan H. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 10:12 am
We are: Michael Abramowicz, Don Clarke, Larry Cunningham, Lisa Fairfax, Theresa Gabaldon, Scott Kieff, Jeff Manns, Dalia Mitchell, Larry Mitchell, and Art Wilmarth. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 9:24 am
Since then, the article has gotten considerable attention, including a thoughtful Volokh Conspiracy post titled “The Right to Unmarry: A Proposal Within a Proposal” by Michael Abramowicz, a Family Law Prof Blog post titled “Marriage Proposal in Family Law Scholarly Article” by Margaret Ryznar, and a lovely Legal Theory Blog post titled “Frye Proposed to Romero: The Right to Unmarry: A Proposal” by… [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 7:53 am
This debate continues to have terrific new contributions, such as by Michael Abramowicz (also attending our conference) and by Michael Burstein and Fiona Murray (who will be blogging about their new prizes paper soon), and prizes are also gaining ground in the popularpress. [read post]
18 Nov 2012, 10:09 am
Michael Risch said poor examination led to bad patents, but the problem will subside; we just need to tweak the current rules. [read post]
16 Nov 2006, 8:51 am
Baird. 10 - NR (98) Prediction Markets for Corporate Governance by Michael Abramowicz & M. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 1:57 pm
The group includes Richard Epstein, Steve Haber, Troy Paredes (now on leave from this academic work), Henry Smith, Joseph Straus, David Teece, Polk Wagner, Josh Wright, and me (these folks listed so far have worked together on a range of recent works arising out of the Hoover Project on Commercializing Innovation), as well as Michael Abramowicz, John Duffy, and Adam Mossoff. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 2:35 pm
J. 2 (2010) 12 66 Abramowicz, Michael; Duffy, John F. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 3:01 pm
Commentator: Michael B. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 7:56 pm
[8]I agree with Abramowicz and Duffy that the answer to this question is “yes, it would be surprising. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 9:14 am
Michael B. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 11:29 am
Co-blogger Michael Abramowicz has a good explanation of why. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 6:29 am
So I agree with this section's overall conclusion, but it is not clear that the inventor stories from Part I can teach us anything about disclosure.Part III contains the most novel aspect of Lemley's argument: not only might races have some benefits (which has been suggested by others like John Duffy, Michael Abramowicz, and Suzanne Scotchmer), but racing might be the dominant normative justification for the patent system. [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 6:55 am
Over at Point of Order, Michael Stern responds to my account of the legislative history and original purposes of Section 4 of the Fourteenth Amendment, the Public Debt Clause.He asks three useful questions.First, why should we pay attention to Senator Wade's speech, which I claim explains the purposes behind section 4, when his proposal was not the final version? [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 8:49 am
Sincerely, Michael Abramowicz (GWU); Martin J. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 4:55 pm
Consider nonobviousness: Professors Michael Abramowicz and John Duffy and Judge Richard Posner have all argued that nonobvoiusness doctrine in its current form does not clearly serve the goal of inducing innovation that would not have been produced in the absence of the patent incentive. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 10:09 am
1035 (2003); Michael Abramowicz, Essay, En Banc Revisited, 100 Colum L. [read post]
