Search for: "Michael C. Smith" Results 1 - 20 of 1,006
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
Many state and local officials host social media sites and use them to converse with followers on matters related to their governmental responsibilities, among other things.[1]  Not surprisingly, many choose to block from their sites certain members of the public they find disagreeable.[2] Being disagreeable, or at least in disagreement with such actions, blocked followers sometimes sue alleging that their exclusion violates the First Amendment.[3]  One of the most notable examples was a… [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:25 pm by Steven Calabresi
I have signed an amicus brief in this case, along with former Attorneys General Ed Meese, Michael Mukasey, and Professor Gary Lawson, and with Citizens United, arguing that Special Counsel Jack Smith was unconstitutionally appointed by Attorney General Merrick Garland. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 7:28 am by John Elwood
Doe, involving First Amendment limitations on imposing liability on protest organizers (Sotomayor filed this statement respecting the denial); and three-time relist Michaels v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court Weighs New Bribery Case as More Clashes Are Brewing MSN – Jan Wolfe and C. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 7:05 am by Norman L. Eisen
In an email on or about April 21, 2018, to Michael Cohen, Robert Costello (“Lawyer C”) allegedly claimed he “had a close relationship with” Giuliani, adding: “[T]his could not be a better situation for the President or you. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The judge also defended her handling of the issue from special counsel Jack Smith, which had surprised legal experts and rankled prosecutors. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
As Adam Smith recognized in The Theory of the Moral Sentiments, business as an institution depends on certain basic moral principles and understandings.[15] Even in his more famous and influential The Wealth of Nations,[16] Smith recognized that promoting excessively “high profits” for capitalists could undermine the economic wealth and moral well-being of a nation as a whole.[17] In my article, I draw also on the contemporary social philosopher Axel Honneth, who… [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 4:50 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
c) Must a claim to a single chemical compound make it plausible that the compound is useful for a particular purpose? [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Louis University Law Journal, Vol. 68, 2024).Linda C. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 5:23 pm by Karina Lytvynska
By Iris Ziwei Che In the world of financial instability, the U.S. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm by renholding
I’d like to thank members of the SEC staff for their work on these final rules, including: Mellissa Duru, Luna Bloom, Elliot Staffin, Kristin Baldwin, Valian Afshar, Almaze Semere, Dennis Hermreck, Nolan McWilliams, Grace Baer, Lindsay McCord, Ethan Horowitz, Robert Errett, Deegi Biteng, Adam Turk, Ted Yu, Liz Walsh, Duc Dang, Brad Skinner, Mike Reedich, Kat Bagley, Cheryl Brown, Jeb Byrne, Nabeel Cheema, John Fieldsend, Jason Weidberg, Michael Coco, Angie Kim, Charli Gibbs-Tabler,… [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 10:23 am by Rebecca Tushnet
David Smith dispute: masculine abstract expressionist, Cubi XII, April 7, 1963. 109 5/8 by 49 ¼ by 32 ¼ inches; Lauren Clay, No side to fall into, 2012 paper and acrylic, 18 ½ by 7 by 3 inches—triggered a C&D. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 12:26 pm by Eugene Volokh
Karlen, decided yesterday by the Missouri Court of Appeals, in an opinion by Judge Kurt Odenwald, joined by Judges Michael E. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm by Mark Walsh
Seated separately in the bar section is Michael Dreeben, an SG’s office veteran who is working for Special Counsel Jack Smith on the criminal prosecution of Trump over Jan. 6. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
If A conspires with B who conspires with C, all are linked in one conspiracy—even if A does not even know that C exists (and vice versa) and even if their specific plans diverge in many details.[23] (This is why the Amar brief repeatedly speaks of, for example, "Floyd and other top officials" and "Floyd and his allies. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]