Search for: "Michael C. Smith" Results 261 - 280 of 1,010
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2008, 11:00 am
Smith, Vice President and General Counsel, Newsweek Interactive. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am
Moll (University of Houston), on Tuesday, April 30, 2024 Tags: close corporations, Closely-held corporations, contractual formalism, corporation, formalism, oppression, reasonable expectations, shareholder oppression, Shareholders Action Items for Boards: Where Directors and C-Suite Leaders Align and Diverge Posted by Frank Kurre, Protiviti; Mark Rogers, BoardProspects; and Michael Tae, Broadridge Investor Communication Solutions, on Tuesday, April 30, 2024 Tags: Board… [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am
Moll (University of Houston), on Tuesday, April 30, 2024 Tags: close corporations, Closely-held corporations, contractual formalism, corporation, formalism, oppression, reasonable expectations, shareholder oppression, Shareholders Action Items for Boards: Where Directors and C-Suite Leaders Align and Diverge Posted by Frank Kurre, Protiviti; Mark Rogers, BoardProspects; and Michael Tae, Broadridge Investor Communication Solutions, on Tuesday, April 30, 2024 Tags: Board… [read post]
27 May 2014, 3:27 am by Jon Gelman
Smith, THE SMITH APPELLATE LAW FIRM, Washington, D.C., for Appellee Drouillard. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 9:35 am by Comunicaciones_MJ
Nahas John Michael Nystrom Amy Ralston Povah David Francis Rowland Joshua James Smith David Tamman Alex Adjmi Fred Keith Alford Mahmoud Reza Banki Stephen Bannon Faustino Bernadett Carl Andrew Boggs, III Todd A. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:36 pm by Glenn Reynolds
UPDATE: Canadian reader Russ Smith writes: I read your post concerning Obama’s virtual colonoscopy with interest. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 6:13 am by Barry Sookman
The judge also ruled there was a strong case that the defendants were violating the Radiocommunication Act: I also find that the Plaintiffs have made a strong prima facie case that the devices sold by the Defendants are used to access content that may contravene paragraph 9(1)(c) of the Radiocommunication Act. [read post]
31 May 2010, 8:45 am by Boston University Law Review
Boston University Law Review, Issue 90:2 (April 2010) SYMPOSIUM Justice for Hedgehogs: A Conference on Ronald Dworkin’s Forthcoming Book Editors’ Foreword KEYNOTE ADDRESS Justice for Hedgehogs Ronald Dworkin, Page 469 PANEL I: TRUTH AND METAETHICS The Possibility of Metaethics Russ Shafer-Landau, Page 479 Moral Skepticism for Foxes Daniel Star, Page 497 Dworkin on External Skepticism Michael Smith, Page 509 A Historian’s Comment on the Metaethics Panel at Justice… [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 6:36 am
Interview of the Smith Debnam Managing Partner and CCO to come—watch this space. 3. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 4:15 am by Ben
Michael Mebes and Stefan Potsch (C-348/13) where the Court held that that framing content - here  copyright protected videos - is not a copyright infringement, even if the framing occurred without the permission of the copyright owner because it is not a “communication to the public” within the meaning of Article 3(1) of the Copyright Directive (2001/29/EC)But time was against us, and whilst this is not a criticism of the seminar or indeed the speakers, to this… [read post]