Search for: "Michael C. Smith" Results 281 - 300 of 700
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2018, 6:11 am
SEC Liability for Social Media Violations Posted by Michael W. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 4:01 pm
Fleming • PATracer.com, Renner Otto Boisselle & Sklar, LLP (Cleveland, OH)Joe Mullin • The Prior Art, IP Law & Business Magazine (San Francisco, CA)Michael C. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 8:11 am by Susan I. Nelson
At this point, I must say I'm surprised the Supremes didn't request Michael C. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:03 am by Schachtman
WOE Cometh Because the WOE methodology is not well described, either in the published literature or in Martyn Smith’s litigation report, it is difficult to understand exactly what the First Circuit approved by reversing Smith’s exclusion.  [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 6:54 am by Brad Kuhn
Louis, and Michael Sullivan, Range West Consultants LLC, Prescott, Arizona What’s Wrong with the Law of Valuation in Eminent Domain: Four Rules to Change - John C. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 5:18 pm by INFORRM
This revelation will lead to speculation that the break-in was linked to attempts to cover up Smith’s crimes. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Smith, Smith & Fawer, L.L.C., New Orleans Ilya Somin, Professor of Law, George Mason University School of Law, Arlington, Virginia Michael Sullivan, Range West Consultants LLC, Prescott, Arizona Joseph P. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 9:04 am
Even so, we’re hopeful that in one of the pending lawsuits challenging the program, including EFF’s case Smith v. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm by Bill Marler
” Like the story of another one of my clients by Michael Moss, “The Burger that Shattered Her Life,” I smell another Pulitzer Prize. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 4:38 am
* Copyright exceptions and user rights in Case C-117/13 Ulmer: a couple of observationsLast week this blog reported on the latest addition to the copyright collection of the CJEU, this being the decision in Case C-117/13 Technische Universität Darmstadt v Eugen Ulmer KG, where the CJEU ruled that Article 5(3)(n) of the InfoSoc Directive, read in conjunction with Article 5(2)(c) of the same directive, must be interpreted as allowing [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 8:46 pm by Dennis Crouch
(Duffy.BPAI.pdf) Joseph Casino and Michael Kasdan, In re Seagate Technology: Willfulness and Waiver, a Summary and a Proposal, 2007 Patently-O Patent L.J. 1 (Casino-Seagate) [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Smith—that narrowly construed the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause as no more than an anti-discrimination rule. [read post]