Search for: "Michael Klarman"
Results 1 - 20
of 145
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2021, 2:00 pm
” The speakers were Michele Goodwin (UCI), Michael Klarman (Harvard) and myself. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 4:30 am
The injection of white nationalism into the Republican Party goes back much further than Donald Trump, as Michael Klrarman demonstrated in great detail in the Harvard Law Review (Klarman 2020). [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
Books The Founders Coup by Michael J. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 4:44 pm
The Supreme Court’s “state action” requirement in the 1883 Civil Rights Cases limited the power of the Civil Rights Act of 1871 until a series of Supreme Court cases in the 1950s suggested the justices were, in the words of historian Michael Klarman, “no longer willing to permit state-action doctrine to obstruct the pursuit of racial equality. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 10:45 am
Professor Michael Klarman of Harvard Law will advocate in favor of court packing, and Dan McLaughlin of the National Review will advocate against. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 9:53 pm
Not Michael Klarman. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 7:04 pm
The majority witnesses—Harvard law professor Michael Klarman, Lisa Graves of the Center for Media and Democracy, and Ben Jealous of People for the American Way—will paint a picture of an out-of-control, activist Supreme Court beholden to big business and moneyed interests. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 4:59 pm
Klarman. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
Constitutional rot is a relative term and is thus a more helpful way to understand the constitutional aspects of our current predicament than concepts like “constitutional crisis” (of which I am perhaps overly fond) or even “authoritarianism” (as in Michael Klarman’s forthcoming Harvard Foreword). [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
The decision was hailed as a great victory.As for Brown, there is an entire cottage industry, led by constitutional historian Michael Klarman, devoted to showing that the decision did little to desegregate schools and much to trigger a white backlash in the south. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 12:28 pm
Readers of this newsletter can read a draft preview of the foreword by Harvard Law Professor Michael Klarman, “The Degradation of American Democracy–and the Court. [read post]
22 May 2020, 6:30 am
Other writers, such as Jack Balkin, Michael Klarman and Sotirios Barber have furthered the study of idolatry from a critical perspective, raising serious questions about how and why these fundamental texts continue to be idolised. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 11:24 am
Klarman, “How Great Were the ‘Great’ Marshall Court Decisions? [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
The authors in the series have included truly remarkable scholars, including not only the individuals you mention above, but also Cass Sunstein, Pam Karlan, Lee Bollinger, Mark Tushnet, Michael Klarman, and on and on and on. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 6:30 am
It is indispensable, which means, as with earlier books that have been the subject of Balkinization symposia, such as those by Jonathan Gienapp or Michael Klarman, that it not only deserves to be read, but really must be read by anyone wishing to be truly literate in the subject of American constitutional law and its development over time. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 3:54 am
Michael Klarman details how the death of segregation was hastened considerably by the backlash to Brown v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 9:30 pm
Michael Klarman devoted his talk in HLS’s “Last Lectures” series to Thurgood Marshall and Ruth Bader Ginsburg, whose lawyering, he said, evinces “hope and resilience in what I find to be an alarming political landscape. [read post]
6 May 2019, 7:30 am
This suggestion has been advanced by Professor Michael Klarman of Harvard Law School, among others. [read post]
6 May 2019, 2:00 am
University of Chicago Law School – Michael Klarman, Kirkland & Ellis Professor of Law, Harvard Law School presents today as part of the Constitutional Law Workshop Series. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 1:15 pm
Professor Michael Klarman recently argued in favor of court-packing as a “remedy” to what he views as “the Republican Party’s hijacking of the Court,” and to offset the two recent appointments made “by a president who lost the popular vote by nearly three million votes” that were “confirmed by a majority of senators who represented a minority of the American population. [read post]
