Search for: "Michael Klarman"
Results 121 - 140
of 168
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2011, 10:47 am
Kerr BOOK REVIEW The Founding Revisited Michael J. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 6:08 pm
Harvard Michael Klarman (Harvard Law) [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 7:13 am
They thus put me in the mind of an important dynamic of American constitutional development that has been identified by the constitutional historians Michael Klarman and Scot Powe. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 3:58 pm
Michael Klarman argues that the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act were the product of a reaction against segregationist violence in the South, which in turn was a response to Brown. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 3:40 pm
Michael J. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 1:04 pm
Magliocca also foregrounds the politics of “backlash” that has been the subject of hot scholarly discussion since Michael Klarman’s provocative application of the concept to the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 11:37 am
Klarman (Harvard), 124 Harv. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 8:45 am
I could have easily written a book twice as long, that wouldn’t have been half as “good” from the reader’s perspective.The vast majority of academic books I’ve read should have been at least 30% shorter, though there are some very long books–like Michael Klarman’s From Jim Crow to Civil Rights–that fully justify their length.UPDATE: I’ll always be grateful to Professor Black of Brandeis University’s History Department, who… [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 6:00 am
Consider, for example, the perspectives on the subject found in the following works: Michael Klarman, From Jim Crow to Civil Rights; Matt Lassiter & Andrew Lewis, eds., The Moderates' Dilemma: Massive Resistance to School Desegregation in Virginia; Neil McMillen, The Citizens' Council: Organized Resistance to the Second Reconstruction; Jason Sokol, There Goes My Every Thing: White Southerners in the Age of Civil Rights; Anders Walker, The Ghost of Jim Crow; and John… [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 8:18 am
Michael Klarman's From Jim Crow to Civil Rights won in 2005; David Kyvig's Explicit and Authentic Acts: Amending the US Constitution, 1776-1995 won in 1997; Edmund Morgan's Inventing the People: The Rise of Popular Sovereignty in England and America won in 1989, along with Foner's Reconstruction. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 10:00 am
Michael Paris thinks so. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 8:36 pm
They are similar to those of an important minority of liberal constitutional law scholars such as Obama’s University of Chicago colleague Gerald Rosenberg, and Michael Klarman. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 6:50 am
” At Bench Memos, Matthew Franck critiques Michael Klarman’s recent Los Angeles Times op-ed on public opinion, gay marriage, and the Supreme Court. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 8:06 am
” Finally, in an opinion piece for the Los Angeles Times, Michael Klarman argues that the Court’s decision is likely to be influenced by the fact that public support for same-sex marriage is continuing to build. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 8:49 am
Some — like my colleague Michael Klarman – argue that Brown itself in 1954 halted what would have been a more gradual, but direct, process toward integration. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:11 pm
See Michael J. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 8:25 am
These items may be checked out by all approved library users.AUTHOR: Klarman, Michael J.TITLE: Unfinished business: racial equality in American history / Michael J. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 4:48 am
Posts this week have included Ken Mack on The Supreme Court as a Racially Representative Institution and Michael Klarman on Has the Supreme Court Been Mainly a Friend or a Foe to African Americans? [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 7:26 am
The following is an essay by Michael J. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 6:34 am
: The Supreme Court’s Impact on Black History for the Past Fifty Years” –Michael Klarman, professor at Harvard Law School “Ending Racial Preferences” –Roger Clegg, president of the Center for Equal Opportunity “Justice Kennedy’s Evolving Views On Race” –Heather Gerken, professor at Yale Law School Podcast: Interview on Brown v. [read post]
