Search for: "Michael Klarman"
Results 141 - 160
of 165
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2019, 7:30 am
This suggestion has been advanced by Professor Michael Klarman of Harvard Law School, among others. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 5:06 am
We draw on these understandings to question leading accounts of backlash featured in the work of Michael Klarman, William Eskridge, and Cass Sunstein. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 11:24 am
Klarman, “How Great Were the ‘Great’ Marshall Court Decisions? [read post]
22 Nov 2007, 6:42 am
Michael Klarman has argued that one perverse effect of Brown was to focus increasing attention on the NAACP, leading to numerous efforts to wipe the organization out in the South, while simultaneously helping demobilize the Civil Rights Movement until the late 1950's. [read post]
9 Jun 2007, 10:19 am
We draw on these understandings to question leading accounts of backlash featured in the work of Michael Klarman, William Eskridge, and Cass Sunstein. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 9:53 pm
Not Michael Klarman. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 1:06 pm
Michael Rappaport, a leading originalist legal academic, defends the notion of the color-blind constitution as consistent with 14th Amendment's original meaning. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 6:00 am
Michael KlarmanFor the Symposium on Michael Klarman, The Framers' Coup: The Making of the United States Constitution. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 4:30 am
The injection of white nationalism into the Republican Party goes back much further than Donald Trump, as Michael Klrarman demonstrated in great detail in the Harvard Law Review (Klarman 2020). [read post]
16 Apr 2017, 7:00 am
For the Symposium on Michael Klarman, The Framers' Coup: The Making of the United States Constitution.On January 20, 2017, Donald Trump began his grim inaugural address by castigating the political establishment for enriching itself at the public’s expense. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 6:05 am
But I wonder if a broader discussion of the threats to reproductive and sexual rights could support an expanded strategy.1) Michael Klarman's argument about backlash is a bit right and mostly wrong. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 3:12 pm
As Michael Klarman writes, they arose from “fierce political backlash” against a few early, favorable state court rulings for marriage equality. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 8:49 am
Some — like my colleague Michael Klarman – argue that Brown itself in 1954 halted what would have been a more gradual, but direct, process toward integration. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 12:42 pm
The legal historian Michael Klarman explained that, in Brown, the Supreme Court converted “an emerging national consensus into a constitutional command,” deeply influenced by “dramatic, political, economic, social, and ideological forces affecting race relations. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
The decision was hailed as a great victory.As for Brown, there is an entire cottage industry, led by constitutional historian Michael Klarman, devoted to showing that the decision did little to desegregate schools and much to trigger a white backlash in the south. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 6:05 am
But I wonder if a broader discussion of the threats to reproductive and sexual rights could support an expanded strategy.1) Michael Klarman's argument about backlash is a bit right and mostly wrong. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 1:03 pm
Lately, the apparent shift has been strong enough to prompt a Harvard law professor, Michael Klarman, to write in a new book: “In 2012, it is hard to remember what a radical concept gay marriage was in 1990. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 12:49 pm
Klarman, The Framers’ Coup: The Making of the U.S. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
Guest Blogger This post was prepared for a roundtable on Reforming the Supreme Court of the United States, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 8:17 am
This is certainly the theme of recent overviews of the Court written by such scholars as Barry Friedman, Michael Klarman, or Lucas Powe, not to mention Mark Graber’s classic demonstration of the way that the Court has often accepted invitations given it by ostensible majoritarian political parties to decide political hot potatoes whose legislative resolution would simply be too risky. [read post]
