Search for: "Michael M. O'Hear"
Results 221 - 238
of 238
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2007, 2:39 am
Jenner & Block's Traci M. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 3:24 pm
Michael O'Hear, a law professor at Marquette University, said the Court of Appeals decision is unusual.First, he said appeals court judges typically issue decisions weeks or months after hearing oral arguments rather than on the same day. [read post]
18 Mar 2007, 5:01 pm
In early September, Michael Biesecker of the N&O broke a troubling story: Sgt. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 11:51 am
O'Brien, Jr., Leonard Rivkind, Michael H. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 11:57 pm
O'Connor, from Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney's New York office. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 10:02 am
Oh, don't you want Peter O'Toole to win? [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:01 pm
" Reporters from the N&O, Herald-Sun, WRAL, FOX, Duke Chronicle, and Los Angeles Times were present; I was live-blogging the hearing. [read post]
20 Jan 2007, 6:51 am
The now-retired Justice Sandra Day O'Connor cast a deciding vote in favor of the law. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 6:10 am
The professor, Elizabeth Teisberg, has co-authored a book called Redefining Health Care with Professor Michael Porter of Harvard. [read post]
26 Dec 2006, 10:42 pm
Michael M. [read post]
4 Dec 2006, 9:54 am
If, as seems so, Justice Anthony M. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 11:13 am
O'Hear Victim Impact Evidence in Federal Capital Trials by Wayne A. [read post]
20 Oct 2006, 1:49 pm
Stephen M. [read post]
17 Oct 2006, 9:25 pm
In an especially shrewd set of observations, Professor Michael O'Hear suggested that shaming punishments might be distinguished from the other divisive issues such as gun control or abortion rights because shaming punishments might be trying to effectuate a moral education of the offender and others in society. [read post]
5 Sep 2006, 9:55 pm
O'Hear recently published Two Types of Consequentialism, Two Types of Formalism: Reconsidering Bordenkircher in Light of Apprendi. [read post]
29 Aug 2006, 11:33 am
Here's some food for thought... [read post]
20 Aug 2006, 9:09 am
I didn't think it was blogworthy until I got back here, and was chuckling to myself (a strange thing when you are sitting alone in your office on a Sunday morning) over Kate Litvak's last comment to Michael O';Hear's post on teaching criminal law: namely learning the criminal statutes (then, I presume, getting the hell out) and getting on to the fun stuff like Article 9. [read post]
21 Jun 2006, 8:19 am
Posted by Stephen M. [read post]
